ILDR vs. NFTY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ILDR (First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ILDR is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while NFTY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. ILDR is actively managed, while NFTY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ILDR returned 11.51%/yr vs 5.79%/yr for NFTY. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ILDR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.

Performance

ILDR vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILDR achieves a 14.03% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -7.30% return.

ILDR

• 1D: -2.72%
• 1M: -0.24%
• YTD: 14.03%
• 6M: 12.50%
• 1Y: 34.64%
• 3Y*: 28.32%
• 5Y*: 11.51%
• 10Y*: —

NFTY

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: -7.30%
• 6M: -7.62%
• 1Y: -6.58%
• 3Y*: 6.30%
• 5Y*: 5.79%
• 10Y*: 8.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILDR vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF	14.03%	29.22%	29.31%	39.34%	-34.95%	7.57%
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF	-7.30%	5.47%	5.18%	24.00%	-3.46%	8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ILDR and NFTY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021	0.41

ILDR vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ILDR	NFTY
Technology	49.8%	9.0%
Healthcare	13.4%	9.9%
Industrials	12.4%	8.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	16.6%
Communication Services	9.1%	1.9%
Financial Services	2.9%	20.9%
Energy	1.6%	8.5%
Utilities	1.5%	3.7%
Basic Materials	-	13.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	8.1%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

ILDR vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILDR

ILDR Risk / Return Rank: 43
ILDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ILDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ILDR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ILDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
ILDR Martin Ratio Rank: 42

NFTY

NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 5
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 5
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILDR vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ILDR	NFTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	-0.45	+1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	-0.58	+2.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	0.94	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	-0.41	+2.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.37	-1.01	+7.37

ILDR vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILDR Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILDR and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ILDR vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILDR drawdown since its inception was -44.61%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILDR and NFTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	ILDR	NFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.61%	-47.67%	+3.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	-16.14%	-1.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.43%	-21.55%	-4.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.61%	-21.55%	-23.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.20%	-15.26%	+8.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.87%	-9.60%	-5.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.46%	6.56%	-1.10%

Volatility

ILDR vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) has a higher volatility of 10.87% compared to First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) at 4.23%. This indicates that ILDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ILDR	NFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.87%	4.23%	+6.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.42%	12.75%	+5.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.16%	14.75%	+8.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.41%	17.41%	+9.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.24%	20.72%	+5.52%

ILDR vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILDR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

ILDR vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

ILDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF	1.91%	1.24%	1.61%	0.13%	5.89%	1.53%	0.61%	0.97%	0.00%	4.10%	3.28%	4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ILDR and NFTY in my portfolio?

ILDR and NFTY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ILDR or NFTY?

ILDR has higher volatility (10.87%) compared to NFTY (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILDR dropped -44.61% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

Which ETF is better, ILDR or NFTY?

On 5-year performance, ILDR leads with 11.51% vs 5.79% for NFTY. On fees, ILDR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ILDR or NFTY?

Over the 5-year period, ILDR has performed better with a 11.51% return vs 5.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ILDR or NFTY?

ILDR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ILDR or NFTY?

NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.00% for ILDR.

What is the main difference between ILDR and NFTY?

ILDR is categorized as Technology Equities, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ILDR and 0.80% for NFTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.