ILCV vs. JPUS
ILCV (iShares Morningstar Value ETF) and JPUS (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ILCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while JPUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ILCV returned 11.90%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for JPUS. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ILCV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for JPUS.
Performance
ILCV vs. JPUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCV achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly lower than JPUS's 15.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ILCV having a 11.90% annualized return and JPUS not far behind at 11.51%.
ILCV
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 29.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.73%
JPUS
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 10.78%
- YTD
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- 23.27%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.05%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.89M | $2.26M | $2.59M | |
| $761.65K | $1.09M | $1.10M |
ILCV vs. JPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 12.42% | 18.79% | 17.03% | 14.43% | -7.02% | 26.71% | -0.84% | 25.19% | -6.24% | 15.00% |
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 15.59% | 11.18% | 13.48% | 10.98% | -8.47% | 29.09% | 7.54% | 25.50% | -6.14% | 20.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCV and JPUS is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015 | 0.87 |
The correlation between ILCV and JPUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ILCV vs. JPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILCV
JPUS
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
ILCV
JPUS
Financial Services
ILCV
JPUS
Healthcare
ILCV
JPUS
Communication Services
ILCV
JPUS
Consumer Cyclical
ILCV
JPUS
Consumer Defensive
ILCV
JPUS
Industrials
ILCV
JPUS
Energy
ILCV
JPUS
Utilities
ILCV
JPUS
Basic Materials
ILCV
JPUS
Real Estate
ILCV
JPUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCV vs. JPUS — Risk / Return Rank
ILCV
JPUS
ILCV vs. JPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILCV | JPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.39 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 3.29 | +0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.65 | 13.52 | +4.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILCV vs. JPUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCV drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than JPUS's maximum drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCV and JPUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCV | JPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -38.69% | -19.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -6.90% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -15.96% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.58% | -19.04% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.53% | -38.69% | +3.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.14% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.26% | -3.77% | -5.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 1.67% | -0.11% |
Volatility
ILCV vs. JPUS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) at 2.52%. This indicates that ILCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCV | JPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 2.52% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.33% | 7.65% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.09% | 10.33% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.16% | 14.45% | -0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 16.71% | -0.08% |
ILCV vs. JPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than JPUS's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ILCV vs. JPUS - Dividend Comparison
ILCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than JPUS's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 1.55% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 2.27% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.93% | 2.32% | 2.76% | 3.01% |
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 1.97% | 2.27% | 2.12% | 2.26% | 2.35% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.16% | 1.25% | 0.77% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILCV and JPUS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ILCV has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to JPUS (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCV dropped -58.63% vs JPUS's -38.69%.
On 10-year performance, ILCV leads with 11.90% vs 11.51% for JPUS. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, JPUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ILCV has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPUS.
JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 1.55% for ILCV.
ILCV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while JPUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCV and 0.18% for JPUS.
ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILCV and JPUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer