PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILCV vs. JPUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILCV vs. JPUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILCV achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly lower than JPUS's 15.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ILCV having a 11.90% annualized return and JPUS not far behind at 11.51%.


ILCV

1D
0.30%
1M
2.03%
6M
10.11%
YTD
12.42%
1Y
29.26%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
11.90%
ALL TIME*
8.73%

JPUS

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.77%
6M
10.78%
YTD
15.59%
1Y
23.27%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
10.05%
10Y*
11.51%
ALL TIME*
12.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.89M$2.26M$2.59M
$761.65K$1.09M$1.10M

ILCV vs. JPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
12.42%18.79%17.03%14.43%-7.02%26.71%-0.84%25.19%-6.24%15.00%
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
15.59%11.18%13.48%10.98%-8.47%29.09%7.54%25.50%-6.14%20.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ILCV and JPUS is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015

0.87

The correlation between ILCV and JPUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ILCV vs. JPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ILCV
JPUS

Technology

22.6%
9.5%

Financial Services

18.3%
8.8%

Healthcare

12.6%
12.7%

Communication Services

9.9%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
11.1%

Industrials

6.8%
8.7%

Energy

5.5%
7.3%

Utilities

3.4%
10.0%

Basic Materials

2.1%
7.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
10.7%

Technology

ILCV
22.6%
JPUS
9.5%

Financial Services

ILCV
18.3%
JPUS
8.8%

Healthcare

ILCV
12.6%
JPUS
12.7%

Communication Services

ILCV
9.9%
JPUS
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ILCV
9.6%
JPUS
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

ILCV
7.3%
JPUS
11.1%

Industrials

ILCV
6.8%
JPUS
8.7%

Energy

ILCV
5.5%
JPUS
7.3%

Utilities

ILCV
3.4%
JPUS
10.0%

Basic Materials

ILCV
2.1%
JPUS
7.2%

Real Estate

ILCV
1.9%
JPUS
10.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILCV vs. JPUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

JPUS
JPUS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
JPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
JPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ILCV vs. JPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ILCVJPUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.39

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

3.29

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.65

13.52

+4.13

ILCV vs. JPUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the JPUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCV and JPUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ILCV vs. JPUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCV drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than JPUS's maximum drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCV and JPUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILCVJPUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.63%

-38.69%

-19.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-6.90%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-15.96%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

-19.04%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.53%

-38.69%

+3.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.14%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.26%

-3.77%

-5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

1.67%

-0.11%

Volatility

ILCV vs. JPUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) at 2.52%. This indicates that ILCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILCVJPUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

2.52%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.33%

7.65%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.09%

10.33%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.16%

14.45%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

16.71%

-0.08%

ILCV vs. JPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILCV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than JPUS's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ILCV vs. JPUS - Dividend Comparison

ILCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than JPUS's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.55%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
1.97%2.27%2.12%2.26%2.35%1.67%1.94%2.09%2.16%1.25%0.77%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


ILCV and JPUS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILCV has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to JPUS (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCV dropped -58.63% vs JPUS's -38.69%.

On 10-year performance, ILCV leads with 11.90% vs 11.51% for JPUS. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, JPUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILCV has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPUS.

JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 1.55% for ILCV.

ILCV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while JPUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCV and 0.18% for JPUS.

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILCV and JPUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer