ILCV vs. EQIN
ILCV (iShares Morningstar Value ETF) and EQIN (Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ILCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while EQIN is a Dividend fund actively managed by Columbia. ILCV is passively managed, while EQIN is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ILCV returned 11.90%/yr vs 12.18%/yr for EQIN. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ILCV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQIN.
Performance
ILCV vs. EQIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ILCV having a 12.42% return and EQIN slightly higher at 12.56%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ILCV having a 11.90% annualized return and EQIN not far ahead at 12.18%.
ILCV
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 29.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.73%
EQIN
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- YTD
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 22.31%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $544.80K | $711.69K | $787.66K | |
| $1.89M | $2.26M | $2.59M |
ILCV vs. EQIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 12.42% | 18.79% | 17.03% | 14.43% | -7.02% | 26.71% | -0.84% | 25.19% | -6.24% | 15.00% |
EQIN Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF | 12.56% | 9.37% | 13.82% | 11.58% | 0.66% | 31.18% | 0.67% | 30.67% | -12.22% | 20.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCV and EQIN is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2016 | 0.80 |
The correlation between ILCV and EQIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ILCV vs. EQIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILCV
EQIN
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
ILCV
EQIN
Financial Services
ILCV
EQIN
Healthcare
ILCV
EQIN
Communication Services
ILCV
EQIN
Consumer Cyclical
ILCV
EQIN
Consumer Defensive
ILCV
EQIN
Industrials
ILCV
EQIN
Energy
ILCV
EQIN
Utilities
ILCV
EQIN
Basic Materials
ILCV
EQIN
Real Estate
ILCV
EQIN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCV vs. EQIN — Risk / Return Rank
ILCV
EQIN
ILCV vs. EQIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILCV | EQIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.36 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 3.96 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.65 | 12.26 | +5.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILCV vs. EQIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCV drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than EQIN's maximum drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCV and EQIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCV | EQIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -42.16% | -16.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -5.41% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -12.05% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.58% | -18.51% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.53% | -42.16% | +6.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.50% | +1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.26% | -4.83% | -4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 1.75% | -0.19% |
Volatility
ILCV vs. EQIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) is 2.91%, while Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that ILCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCV | EQIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 3.33% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.33% | 7.32% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.09% | 10.55% | -0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.16% | 14.52% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 18.47% | -1.84% |
ILCV vs. EQIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than EQIN's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ILCV vs. EQIN - Dividend Comparison
ILCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than EQIN's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQIN Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF | 1.86% | 2.05% | 4.34% | 2.41% | 2.71% | 2.57% | 2.54% | 2.70% | 7.81% | 11.52% | 2.44% | 0.00% |
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 1.55% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 2.27% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.93% | 2.32% | 2.76% | 3.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILCV and EQIN have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQIN has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to ILCV (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCV dropped -58.63% vs EQIN's -42.16%.
On 10-year performance, EQIN leads with 12.18% vs 11.90% for ILCV. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EQIN has performed better with a 12.18% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQIN.
EQIN has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.55% for ILCV.
ILCV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while EQIN is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Columbia. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCV and 0.35% for EQIN.
ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILCV and EQIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer