PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILCG vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILCG vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILCG achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, ILCG has outperformed SPY with an annualized return of 18.10%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively lower 15.53% annualized return.


ILCG

1D
-2.86%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
9.21%
6M
7.82%
1Y
22.02%
3Y*
23.80%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
18.10%

SPY

1D
-1.45%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
8.15%
6M
7.20%
1Y
23.59%
3Y*
20.68%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILCG vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
9.21%16.71%32.82%40.41%-31.75%24.33%38.56%33.22%2.06%30.57%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
8.15%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ILCG and SPY is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2004

0.92

The correlation between ILCG and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

ILCG vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ILCG
SPY

Technology

53.1%
39.0%

Communication Services

13.5%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.9%

Industrials

7.7%
7.8%

Financial Services

5.5%
11.1%

Healthcare

5.2%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
4.5%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.7%

Utilities

0.7%
2.1%

Energy

0.4%
3.1%

Technology

ILCG
53.1%
SPY
39.0%

Communication Services

ILCG
13.5%
SPY
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ILCG
10.1%
SPY
9.9%

Industrials

ILCG
7.7%
SPY
7.8%

Financial Services

ILCG
5.5%
SPY
11.1%

Healthcare

ILCG
5.2%
SPY
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

ILCG
1.4%
SPY
4.5%

Real Estate

ILCG
1.3%
SPY
1.8%

Basic Materials

ILCG
1.0%
SPY
1.7%

Utilities

ILCG
0.7%
SPY
2.1%

Energy

ILCG
0.4%
SPY
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILCG vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILCG
ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILCG vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ILCGSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.67

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

11.92

-7.06

ILCG vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCG and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ILCG vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCG drawdown since its inception was -52.98%, roughly equal to the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCG and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILCGSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.98%

-55.19%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.65%

-8.88%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.10%

-18.76%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.38%

-24.50%

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

-33.72%

-1.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.58%

-3.17%

-2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-9.04%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.54%

1.98%

+2.56%

Volatility

ILCG vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.87%. This indicates that ILCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILCGSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.83%

4.87%

+2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.51%

9.85%

+4.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

12.50%

+5.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.22%

17.15%

+5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.63%

17.95%

+3.68%

ILCG vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILCG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ILCG vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

ILCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than SPY's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
0.42%0.47%0.50%0.69%0.75%0.34%0.28%0.54%0.81%0.89%0.95%0.99%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, ILCG and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ILCG has higher volatility (7.83%) compared to SPY (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCG dropped -52.98% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, ILCG leads with 18.10% vs 15.53% for SPY. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 18.10% return vs 15.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPY.

SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.42% for ILCG.

ILCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCG and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILCG and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer