ILCG vs. SPY
ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ILCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ILCG returned 18.15%/yr vs 15.49%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ILCG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
ILCG vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCG achieves a 14.48% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, ILCG has outperformed SPY with an annualized return of 18.15%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively lower 15.49% annualized return.
ILCG
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 7.68%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 14.61%
- 1Y
- 29.51%
- 3Y*
- 26.55%
- 5Y*
- 14.95%
- 10Y*
- 18.15%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
ILCG vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 14.48% | 16.71% | 32.82% | 40.41% | -31.75% | 24.33% | 38.56% | 33.22% | 2.06% | 30.57% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCG and SPY is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2004 | 0.92 |
The correlation between ILCG and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
ILCG vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILCG
SPY
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
ILCG
SPY
Communication Services
ILCG
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
ILCG
SPY
Industrials
ILCG
SPY
Financial Services
ILCG
SPY
Healthcare
ILCG
SPY
Consumer Defensive
ILCG
SPY
Real Estate
ILCG
SPY
Basic Materials
ILCG
SPY
Utilities
ILCG
SPY
Energy
ILCG
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCG vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
ILCG
SPY
ILCG vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILCG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.43 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 3.16 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.68 | 14.72 | -8.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILCG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 2.38 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.82 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.87 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
ILCG vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCG drawdown since its inception was -52.98%, roughly equal to the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCG and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.98% | -55.19% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.65% | -8.88% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.10% | -18.76% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.38% | -24.50% | -10.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.38% | -33.72% | -1.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -0.70% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.22% | -9.05% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 1.91% | +2.52% |
Volatility
ILCG vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that ILCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 2.84% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.81% | 8.90% | +3.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.31% | 11.83% | +4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.00% | 17.05% | +4.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 17.94% | +3.59% |
ILCG vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ILCG vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
ILCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, ILCG and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ILCG has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCG dropped -52.98% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, ILCG leads with 18.15% vs 15.49% for SPY. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 15.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPY.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.40% for ILCG.
ILCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCG and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILCG and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer