PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IKSA.L vs. IGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IKSA.L vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia Capped UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IKSA.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IKSA.L achieves a 3.91% return, which is significantly higher than IGLN.L's -6.13% return.


IKSA.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
-3.30%
6M
-1.94%
YTD
3.91%
1Y
2.55%
3Y*
-0.39%
5Y*
2.00%
10Y*

IGLN.L

1D
-0.82%
1M
-7.02%
6M
-12.44%
YTD
-6.13%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
27.22%
5Y*
17.30%
10Y*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IKSA.L vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IKSA.L
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia Capped UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
3.91%-5.49%0.31%9.40%-5.61%36.71%0.68%-10.51%
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
-6.13%64.93%26.14%13.44%-0.09%-4.03%24.16%16.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IKSA.L and IGLN.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2019

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IKSA.L vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IKSA.L
IKSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IKSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IKSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IKSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
IKSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
IKSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLN.L
IGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IKSA.L vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia Capped UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IKSA.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IKSA.LIGLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.16

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

0.88

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.56

2.15

-1.59

IKSA.L vs. IGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IKSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IKSA.L and IGLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IKSA.L vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IKSA.L drawdown since its inception was -52.22%, which is greater than IGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -45.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IKSA.L and IGLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IKSA.LIGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.22%

-45.25%

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-24.39%

+13.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.79%

-24.39%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

-24.39%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.45%

-23.66%

+5.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.63%

-19.73%

+4.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

9.97%

-4.82%

Volatility

IKSA.L vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia Capped UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IKSA.L) is 2.54%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that IKSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IKSA.LIGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

7.59%

-5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

23.02%

-12.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.27%

26.39%

-11.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

17.79%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

15.74%

+7.28%

IKSA.L vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IKSA.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

IKSA.L vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IKSA.L nor IGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IKSA.L and IGLN.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IKSA.L.

IKSA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IGLN.L is Gold. IKSA.L tracks iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia Capped UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IKSA.L and 0.12% for IGLN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IKSA.L and IGLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer