PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJUL vs. ZDEK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IJUL vs. ZDEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December (ZDEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IJUL vs. ZDEK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJUL achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than ZDEK's -0.30% return.


IJUL

1D
0.68%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
1.41%
6M
3.48%
1Y
16.60%
3Y*
10.22%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*

ZDEK

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
-0.30%
6M
1.51%
1Y
8.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IJUL vs. ZDEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ZDEK's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IJUL vs. ZDEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJUL
IJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ZDEK
ZDEK Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ZDEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDEK Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDEK Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJUL vs. ZDEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December (ZDEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJULZDEKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

2.43

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

3.69

-1.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.50

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

5.32

-2.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.37

21.69

-10.31

IJUL vs. ZDEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the ZDEK Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJUL and ZDEK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJULZDEKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

2.43

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

1.54

-1.01

Correlation

The correlation between IJUL and ZDEK is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IJUL vs. ZDEK - Dividend Comparison

Neither IJUL nor ZDEK has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
IJUL
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.99%
ZDEK
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IJUL vs. ZDEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJUL drawdown since its inception was -21.09%, which is greater than ZDEK's maximum drawdown of -3.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJUL and ZDEK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IJULZDEKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.09%

-3.40%

-17.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.72%

-1.57%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-0.87%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-0.50%

-2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

0.39%

+1.08%

Volatility

IJUL vs. ZDEK - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December (ZDEK) at 0.97%. This indicates that IJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZDEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IJULZDEKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

0.97%

+3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.82%

2.01%

+3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

3.33%

+6.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.75%

3.45%

+6.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.14%

3.45%

+7.69%