PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJUL vs. IAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IJUL vs. IAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IJUL vs. IAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IJUL
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July
1.41%20.98%2.12%13.77%-2.77%0.75%
IAPR
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April
3.70%15.51%3.76%7.67%-7.61%2.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJUL achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than IAPR's 3.70% return.


IJUL

1D
0.68%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
1.41%
6M
3.48%
1Y
16.60%
3Y*
10.22%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*

IAPR

1D
0.98%
1M
1.81%
YTD
3.70%
6M
6.04%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
9.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IJUL vs. IAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IJUL and IAPR have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Return for Risk

IJUL vs. IAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJUL
IJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

IAPR
IAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJUL vs. IAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJULIAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

1.94

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

2.81

-0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.46

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

2.65

+0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.37

17.48

-6.11

IJUL vs. IAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the IAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJUL and IAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJULIAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

1.94

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.57

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between IJUL and IAPR is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IJUL vs. IAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither IJUL nor IAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
IJUL
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.99%
IAPR
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IJUL vs. IAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJUL drawdown since its inception was -21.09%, which is greater than IAPR's maximum drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJUL and IAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IJULIAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.09%

-17.73%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.72%

-6.08%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

0.00%

-2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-3.99%

+1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

0.92%

+0.55%

Volatility

IJUL vs. IAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) at 2.88%. This indicates that IJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IJULIAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

2.88%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.82%

4.03%

+1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

8.40%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.75%

8.71%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.14%

8.71%

+2.43%