PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAPR vs. FMAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IAPR vs. FMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IAPR vs. FMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IAPR
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April
2.69%15.51%3.76%7.67%-7.61%2.74%
FMAR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March
2.16%9.69%14.61%20.39%-5.51%9.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAPR achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly higher than FMAR's 2.16% return.


IAPR

1D
1.25%
1M
0.70%
YTD
2.69%
6M
5.32%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
8.92%
5Y*
10Y*

FMAR

1D
1.89%
1M
0.92%
YTD
2.16%
6M
4.53%
1Y
14.91%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IAPR vs. FMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IAPR and FMAR have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Return for Risk

IAPR vs. FMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAPR
IAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FMAR
FMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAPR vs. FMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAPRFMARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

1.36

+0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.62

1.99

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.84

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.34

11.70

+3.64

IAPR vs. FMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAPR Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the FMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAPR and FMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAPRFMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.36

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.98

-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between IAPR and FMAR is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IAPR vs. FMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAPR nor FMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IAPR vs. FMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAPR drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, which is greater than FMAR's maximum drawdown of -14.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAPR and FMAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IAPRFMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.73%

-14.36%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.08%

-8.31%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.49%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-2.21%

-1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

1.30%

-0.38%

Volatility

IAPR vs. FMAR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) have volatilities of 2.78% and 2.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IAPRFMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.90%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.92%

3.75%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.38%

11.04%

-2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.70%

10.49%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.70%

10.47%

-1.77%