IJUL vs. BAPR
IJUL (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July) and BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - IJUL tracks the MSCI EAFE Index while BAPR tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IJUL returned 7.77%/yr vs 11.17%/yr for BAPR. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IJUL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for BAPR.
Performance
IJUL vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJUL achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 10.81% return.
IJUL
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 5.68%
- 6M
- 7.34%
- 1Y
- 13.33%
- 3Y*
- 11.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- —
BAPR
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 20.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- —
IJUL vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJUL Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July | 5.68% | 20.98% | 2.12% | 13.77% | -2.77% | 2.80% | 0.42% | 3.35% |
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 10.81% | 8.28% | 15.95% | 23.16% | -7.04% | 12.58% | 6.19% | 7.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJUL and BAPR is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2019 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IJUL and BAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJUL vs. BAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJUL
BAPR
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IJUL
BAPR
Industrials
IJUL
BAPR
Healthcare
IJUL
BAPR
Technology
IJUL
BAPR
Consumer Cyclical
IJUL
BAPR
Consumer Defensive
IJUL
BAPR
Basic Materials
IJUL
BAPR
Communication Services
IJUL
BAPR
Energy
IJUL
BAPR
Utilities
IJUL
BAPR
Real Estate
IJUL
BAPR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJUL vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank
IJUL
BAPR
IJUL vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJUL | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.87 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 10.46 | -7.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.93 | 57.55 | -47.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJUL | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 3.59 | -1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.98 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.84 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
IJUL vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJUL drawdown since its inception was -21.09%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJUL and BAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJUL | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.09% | -23.91% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.35% | -1.93% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.27% | -15.58% | +7.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.59% | -15.58% | +0.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.23% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.55% | -2.59% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 0.35% | +1.00% |
Volatility
IJUL vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) has a higher volatility of 1.90% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) at 1.06%. This indicates that IJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJUL | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.90% | 1.06% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.09% | 4.53% | +1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.03% | 5.64% | +2.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.85% | 11.49% | -1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.08% | 13.12% | -2.04% |
IJUL vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJUL vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither IJUL nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJUL Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJUL and BAPR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJUL has higher volatility (1.90%) compared to BAPR (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJUL dropped -21.09% vs BAPR's -23.91%.
On 5-year performance, BAPR leads with 11.17% vs 7.77% for IJUL. On fees, BAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BAPR has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 7.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IJUL.
IJUL and BAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
IJUL tracks MSCI EAFE Index, while BAPR tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IJUL and 0.79% for BAPR.
BAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJUL and BAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer