IJR vs. XLK
IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJR returned 11.06%/yr vs 25.67%/yr for XLK. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IJR charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
IJR vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJR achieves a 19.71% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 33.14% return. Over the past 10 years, IJR has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 11.06%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.67% annualized return.
IJR
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 5.41%
- YTD
- 19.71%
- 6M
- 17.56%
- 1Y
- 36.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
XLK
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- 7.19%
- YTD
- 33.14%
- 6M
- 32.76%
- 1Y
- 60.08%
- 3Y*
- 31.17%
- 5Y*
- 22.86%
- 10Y*
- 25.67%
IJR vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 19.71% | 5.89% | 8.63% | 16.06% | -16.20% | 26.58% | 11.28% | 22.82% | -8.51% | 13.15% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 33.14% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJR and XLK is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2000 | 0.71 |
The correlation between IJR and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IJR vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJR
XLK
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
IJR
XLK
-
Industrials
IJR
XLK
Technology
IJR
XLK
Consumer Cyclical
IJR
XLK
-
Healthcare
IJR
XLK
-
Real Estate
IJR
XLK
-
Energy
IJR
XLK
Basic Materials
IJR
XLK
-
Communication Services
IJR
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
IJR
XLK
-
Utilities
IJR
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJR vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
IJR
XLK
IJR vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IJR | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 3.75 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.18 | 12.01 | +2.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IJR vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJR drawdown since its inception was -58.15%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJR and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJR | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.15% | -82.05% | +23.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -15.92% | +7.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.02% | -25.66% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.02% | -33.56% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.36% | -33.56% | -10.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -3.42% | +3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.27% | -34.91% | +25.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 4.96% | -2.38% |
Volatility
IJR vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) is 5.21%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 11.79%. This indicates that IJR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJR | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 11.79% | -6.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.06% | 19.39% | -7.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.72% | 23.08% | -5.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 25.30% | -3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 24.70% | -1.77% |
IJR vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJR vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
IJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than XLK's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.15% | 1.44% | 2.05% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.48% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJR and XLK have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (11.79%) compared to IJR (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJR dropped -58.15% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.67% vs 11.06% for IJR. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJR has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.67% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLK.
IJR has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.40% for XLK.
IJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IJR and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJR and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer