IJR vs. ROSC
IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) and ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - IJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index while ROSC tracks the ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJR returned 11.30%/yr vs 11.36%/yr for ROSC. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJR charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ROSC.
Performance
IJR vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJR achieves a 19.34% return, which is significantly higher than ROSC's 16.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJR having a 11.30% annualized return and ROSC not far ahead at 11.36%.
IJR
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 19.34%
- 6M
- 16.86%
- 1Y
- 34.47%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
ROSC
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 16.64%
- 6M
- 14.85%
- 1Y
- 34.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
IJR vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 19.34% | 5.89% | 8.63% | 16.06% | -16.20% | 26.58% | 11.28% | 22.82% | -8.51% | 13.15% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 16.64% | 10.18% | 7.28% | 18.88% | -10.58% | 31.37% | 5.27% | 17.09% | -12.38% | 24.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJR and ROSC is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015 | 0.85 |
The correlation between IJR and ROSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (all time) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IJR vs. ROSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJR
ROSC
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
IJR
ROSC
Industrials
IJR
ROSC
Technology
IJR
ROSC
Consumer Cyclical
IJR
ROSC
Healthcare
IJR
ROSC
Real Estate
IJR
ROSC
Energy
IJR
ROSC
Basic Materials
IJR
ROSC
Communication Services
IJR
ROSC
Consumer Defensive
IJR
ROSC
Utilities
IJR
ROSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJR vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank
IJR
ROSC
IJR vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IJR | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.40 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 4.52 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.39 | 14.75 | -1.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IJR vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJR drawdown since its inception was -58.15%, which is greater than ROSC's maximum drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJR and ROSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJR | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.15% | -43.13% | -15.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -7.75% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.02% | -23.74% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.02% | -23.74% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.36% | -43.13% | -1.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -0.33% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.26% | -7.18% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.37% | +0.21% |
Volatility
IJR vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) at 3.54%. This indicates that IJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJR | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 3.54% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.06% | 10.40% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.73% | 15.53% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.40% | 19.29% | +2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 20.24% | +2.66% |
IJR vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJR vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison
IJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than ROSC's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.15% | 1.44% | 2.05% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.48% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.79% | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 2.13% | 1.75% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 2.13% | 2.20% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IJR and ROSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IJR has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to ROSC (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJR dropped -58.15% vs ROSC's -43.13%.
On 10-year performance, ROSC leads with 11.36% vs 11.30% for IJR. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ROSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ROSC has performed better with a 11.36% return vs 11.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ROSC.
ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.15% for IJR.
IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IJR and 0.34% for ROSC.
ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJR and ROSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer