PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJR vs. IWC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJR vs. IWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJR achieves a 15.38% return, which is significantly lower than IWC's 18.97% return. Over the past 10 years, IJR has underperformed IWC with an annualized return of 10.66%, while IWC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.


IJR

1D
-0.89%
1M
1.67%
YTD
15.38%
6M
14.25%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
10.66%

IWC

1D
-2.09%
1M
2.88%
YTD
18.97%
6M
18.63%
1Y
55.24%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
5.45%
10Y*
11.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJR vs. IWC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
15.38%5.89%8.63%16.06%-16.20%26.58%11.28%22.82%-8.51%13.15%
IWC
iShares Micro-Cap ETF
18.97%22.45%13.63%8.99%-21.93%18.67%20.88%22.20%-13.13%12.79%

Correlation

The correlation between IJR and IWC is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2005

0.93

The correlation between IJR and IWC shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IJR vs. IWC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJR
IWC

Financial Services

16.8%
18.1%

Industrials

15.5%
13.3%

Technology

15.5%
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
5.3%

Healthcare

11.1%
28.1%

Real Estate

7.6%
3.5%

Energy

5.9%
4.7%

Basic Materials

5.1%
4.4%

Communication Services

3.6%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
1.9%

Utilities

2.0%
0.6%

Financial Services

IJR
16.8%
IWC
18.1%

Industrials

IJR
15.5%
IWC
13.3%

Technology

IJR
15.5%
IWC
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IJR
13.4%
IWC
5.3%

Healthcare

IJR
11.1%
IWC
28.1%

Real Estate

IJR
7.6%
IWC
3.5%

Energy

IJR
5.9%
IWC
4.7%

Basic Materials

IJR
5.1%
IWC
4.4%

Communication Services

IJR
3.6%
IWC
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

IJR
3.5%
IWC
1.9%

Utilities

IJR
2.0%
IWC
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJR vs. IWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJR
IJR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJR Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

IWC
IWC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJR vs. IWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJRIWCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

4.47

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

14.76

-2.62

IJR vs. IWC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJR Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the IWC Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJR and IWC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJRIWCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.36

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.22

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.47

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.31

+0.12

Drawdowns

IJR vs. IWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJR drawdown since its inception was -58.15%, smaller than the maximum IWC drawdown of -64.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJR and IWC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJRIWCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.15%

-64.61%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-12.43%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.02%

-29.46%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

-40.68%

+12.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.36%

-47.21%

+2.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-2.90%

+1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-15.28%

+6.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

3.75%

-1.15%

Volatility

IJR vs. IWC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) is 4.45%, while iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that IJR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJRIWCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

7.29%

-2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.65%

17.26%

-5.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.54%

23.63%

-6.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.41%

24.42%

-3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.91%

24.42%

-1.51%

IJR vs. IWC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IWC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJR vs. IWC - Dividend Comparison

IJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than IWC's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
1.15%1.44%2.05%1.31%1.41%1.53%1.11%1.44%1.58%1.20%1.22%1.48%
IWC
iShares Micro-Cap ETF
0.91%1.10%1.06%1.17%1.18%0.78%0.98%1.19%1.01%1.09%1.16%1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJR and IWC have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWC has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to IJR (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJR dropped -58.15% vs IWC's -64.61%.

On 10-year performance, IWC leads with 11.35% vs 10.66% for IJR. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJR has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWC has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 10.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IWC.

IJR has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.91% for IWC.

IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while IWC tracks Russell Microcap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IJR and 0.60% for IWC.

IWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJR and IWC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer