IJR vs. IEMG

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJR returned 10.61%/yr vs 9.88%/yr for IEMG. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IJR charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.

Performance

IJR vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJR achieves a 15.49% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 18.97% return. Over the past 10 years, IJR has outperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 10.61%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively lower 9.88% annualized return.

IJR

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 15.49%
• 6M: 15.12%
• 1Y: 30.47%
• 3Y*: 13.78%
• 5Y*: 5.37%
• 10Y*: 10.61%

IEMG

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: -3.66%
• YTD: 18.97%
• 6M: 20.80%
• 1Y: 40.80%
• 3Y*: 20.51%
• 5Y*: 6.57%
• 10Y*: 9.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJR vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF	15.49%	5.89%	8.63%	16.06%	-16.20%	26.58%	11.28%	22.82%	-8.51%	13.15%
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	18.97%	32.56%	6.50%	11.52%	-19.98%	-0.64%	17.87%	17.81%	-14.92%	37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IJR and IEMG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012	0.59

The correlation between IJR and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJR vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IJR	IEMG
Financial Services	16.8%	18.4%
Industrials	15.5%	9.0%
Technology	15.5%	35.0%
Consumer Cyclical	13.4%	9.5%
Healthcare	11.1%	3.7%
Real Estate	7.6%	1.7%
Energy	5.9%	3.8%
Basic Materials	5.1%	6.9%
Communication Services	3.6%	6.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	3.3%
Utilities	2.0%	2.2%

Return for Risk

IJR vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJR

IJR Risk / Return Rank: 63
IJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
IJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
IJR Omega Ratio Rank: 53
IJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
IJR Martin Ratio Rank: 69

IEMG

IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 67
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJR vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IJR	IEMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.99	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	2.58	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.38	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	3.10	+0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.72	11.68	+0.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IJR vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJR Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJR and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IJR	IEMG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	1.99	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.35	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.49	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.33	+0.11

Drawdowns

IJR vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJR drawdown since its inception was -58.15%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJR and IEMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	IJR	IEMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.15%	-38.71%	-19.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	-13.21%	+4.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.02%	-17.21%	-10.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.02%	-35.75%	+7.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.36%	-38.71%	-5.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.20%	-7.00%	+5.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.28%	-12.97%	+3.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	3.50%	-0.89%

Volatility

IJR vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) is 4.73%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 10.33%. This indicates that IJR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IJR	IEMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.73%	10.33%	-5.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.82%	18.35%	-6.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.63%	20.62%	-2.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.42%	18.62%	+2.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.92%	20.14%	+2.78%

IJR vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IJR vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

IJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than IEMG's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	2.31%	2.75%	3.20%	2.89%	2.71%	3.06%	1.87%	3.15%	2.76%	2.35%	2.28%	2.53%
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF	1.15%	1.44%	2.05%	1.31%	1.41%	1.53%	1.11%	1.44%	1.58%	1.20%	1.22%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IJR and IEMG in my portfolio?

IJR and IEMG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IJR or IEMG?

IEMG has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to IJR (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJR dropped -58.15% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

Which ETF is better, IJR or IEMG?

On 10-year performance, IJR leads with 10.61% vs 9.88% for IEMG. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJR has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IJR or IEMG?

Over the 10-year period, IJR has performed better with a 10.61% return vs 9.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IJR or IEMG?

IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for IEMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IJR or IEMG?

IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.15% for IJR.

What is the main difference between IJR and IEMG?

IJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IJR and 0.09% for IEMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.