IJK vs. KMID

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

IJK (iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF) and KMID (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. IJK is passively managed, while KMID is actively managed. Over the past year, IJK returned 23.12% vs -0.05% for KMID. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJK charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for KMID.

Performance

IJK vs. KMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJK achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly higher than KMID's 3.35% return.

IJK

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -1.66%
• 6M: 11.09%
• YTD: 16.79%
• 1Y: 23.12%
• 3Y*: 14.76%
• 5Y*: 8.16%
• 10Y*: 11.01%

KMID

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: -0.65%
• YTD: 3.35%
• 1Y: -0.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJK vs. KMID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF	16.79%	7.28%	-2.18%
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF	3.35%	0.31%	-3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IJK and KMID is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2024	0.81

The correlation between IJK and KMID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJK vs. KMID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IJK	KMID
Industrials	30.2%	52.2%
Technology	24.8%	15.8%
Healthcare	13.7%	11.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	8.7%
Financial Services	6.7%	11.8%
Real Estate	5.3%	-
Basic Materials	3.5%	-
Energy	3.2%	-
Utilities	2.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.8%	-
Communication Services	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

IJK vs. KMID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJK

IJK Risk / Return Rank: 52
IJK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
IJK Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
IJK Omega Ratio Rank: 44
IJK Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
IJK Martin Ratio Rank: 64

KMID

KMID Risk / Return Rank: 9
KMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
KMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
KMID Omega Ratio Rank: 9
KMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
KMID Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJK vs. KMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IJK	KMID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	-0.00	+1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	0.10	+1.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.01	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	-0.01	+2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.03	-0.01	+9.04

IJK vs. KMID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJK Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the KMID Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJK and KMID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IJK vs. KMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJK drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, which is greater than KMID's maximum drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJK and KMID.

Drawdown Indicators

	IJK	KMID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.47%	-18.89%	-35.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.92%	-10.71%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.91%	-3.90%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.76%	-5.70%	-5.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	4.43%	-1.86%

Volatility

IJK vs. KMID - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID) at 4.46%. This indicates that IJK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IJK	KMID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.51%	4.46%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.93%	11.65%	+2.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.84%	14.91%	+2.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.81%	16.84%	+3.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.06%	16.84%	+4.22%

IJK vs. KMID - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJK has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than KMID's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

IJK vs. KMID - Dividend Comparison

IJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than KMID's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF	0.54%	0.66%	0.79%	1.13%	1.08%	0.50%	0.70%	1.09%	1.13%	0.93%	1.15%	1.12%
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF	0.11%	0.06%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IJK and KMID in my portfolio?

IJK and KMID have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IJK or KMID?

IJK has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to KMID (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJK dropped -54.47% vs KMID's -18.89%.

Which ETF is better, IJK or KMID?

On 1-year performance, IJK leads with 23.12% vs -0.05% for KMID. On fees, IJK is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, KMID has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IJK or KMID?

Over the 1-year period, IJK has performed better with a 23.12% return vs -0.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IJK or KMID?

IJK is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for KMID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IJK or KMID?

IJK has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.11% for KMID.

What is the main difference between IJK and KMID?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for IJK and 0.80% for KMID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IJK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.