IJK vs. JSMD
IJK (iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF) and JSMD (Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - IJK tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index while JSMD tracks the Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJK returned 11.02%/yr vs 13.14%/yr for JSMD. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJK charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JSMD.
Performance
IJK vs. JSMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IJK having a 17.02% return and JSMD slightly higher at 17.41%. Over the past 10 years, IJK has underperformed JSMD with an annualized return of 11.02%, while JSMD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.
IJK
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- 6M
- 9.42%
- YTD
- 17.02%
- 1Y
- 24.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
JSMD
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- 6M
- 9.85%
- YTD
- 17.41%
- 1Y
- 22.75%
- 3Y*
- 14.72%
- 5Y*
- 8.56%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
IJK vs. JSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 17.02% | 7.28% | 15.68% | 17.41% | -19.03% | 18.68% | 22.45% | 25.96% | -10.53% | 19.64% |
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 17.41% | 9.25% | 15.08% | 26.81% | -22.84% | 8.40% | 30.79% | 31.05% | -4.73% | 24.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJK and JSMD is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016 | 0.90 |
The correlation between IJK and JSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJK vs. JSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJK
JSMD
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
IJK
JSMD
Technology
IJK
JSMD
Healthcare
IJK
JSMD
Consumer Cyclical
IJK
JSMD
Financial Services
IJK
JSMD
Real Estate
IJK
JSMD
Basic Materials
IJK
JSMD
Energy
IJK
JSMD
Utilities
IJK
JSMD
-
Consumer Defensive
IJK
JSMD
Communication Services
IJK
JSMD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJK vs. JSMD — Risk / Return Rank
IJK
JSMD
IJK vs. JSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IJK | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.19 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 1.54 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | 5.12 | +4.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IJK vs. JSMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJK drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, which is greater than JSMD's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJK and JSMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJK | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.47% | -38.98% | -15.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -14.86% | +4.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.63% | -24.01% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -32.18% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.25% | -38.98% | -0.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.73% | -5.59% | +1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -7.42% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 4.45% | -1.86% |
Volatility
IJK vs. JSMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) is 4.51%, while Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that IJK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJK | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 6.01% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.89% | 17.49% | -3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.73% | 22.16% | -4.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 23.09% | -2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 22.80% | -1.74% |
IJK vs. JSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJK has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than JSMD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJK vs. JSMD - Dividend Comparison
IJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than JSMD's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 1.09% | 1.13% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.12% |
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.43% | 0.54% | 0.76% | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.53% | 0.30% | 0.36% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, IJK and JSMD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JSMD has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to IJK (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJK dropped -54.47% vs JSMD's -38.98%.
On 10-year performance, JSMD leads with 13.14% vs 11.02% for IJK. On fees, IJK is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, IJK has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 13.14% return vs 11.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJK is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSMD.
IJK has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.43% for JSMD.
IJK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for IJK and 0.30% for JSMD.
IJK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJK and JSMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer