PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJAN vs. FBUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJAN vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - January (IJAN) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJAN achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly lower than FBUF's 5.54% return.


IJAN

1D
0.22%
1M
1.35%
YTD
4.67%
6M
5.64%
1Y
11.91%
3Y*
9.66%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*

FBUF

1D
0.21%
1M
2.65%
YTD
5.54%
6M
6.41%
1Y
19.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJAN vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IJAN and FBUF is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2024

0.60

The correlation between IJAN and FBUF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJAN vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJAN
IJAN Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FBUF
FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJAN vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - January (IJAN) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJANFBUFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.53

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

3.53

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.25

15.78

-7.53

IJAN vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the FBUF Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJAN and FBUF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJANFBUFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

2.65

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.48

-0.93

Drawdowns

IJAN vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJAN drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJAN and FBUF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJANFBUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.68%

-11.09%

-11.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.14%

-5.61%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.01%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-1.37%

-1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

1.25%

+0.20%

Volatility

IJAN vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - January (IJAN) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) at 1.08%. This indicates that IJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJANFBUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

1.08%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.44%

5.37%

+1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.32%

7.48%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.29%

9.54%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.50%

9.54%

+2.96%

IJAN vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJAN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJAN vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

IJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IJAN and FBUF have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJAN has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to FBUF (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJAN dropped -22.68% vs FBUF's -11.09%.

On 1-year performance, FBUF leads with 19.74% vs 11.91% for IJAN. On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, FBUF has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FBUF has performed better with a 19.74% return vs 11.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IJAN.

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for IJAN.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IJAN and 0.48% for FBUF.

FBUF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJAN and FBUF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer