CSMCX vs. AMAGX
CSMCX (Congress Small Cap Growth Fund) and AMAGX (Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares) are both mutual funds - CSMCX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Congress, while AMAGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Amana. Over the past 10 years, CSMCX returned 17.39%/yr vs 17.87%/yr for AMAGX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSMCX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for AMAGX.
Performance
CSMCX vs. AMAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSMCX achieves a 18.84% return, which is significantly higher than AMAGX's 15.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSMCX having a 17.39% annualized return and AMAGX not far ahead at 17.87%.
CSMCX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 8.19%
- YTD
- 18.84%
- 6M
- 15.45%
- 1Y
- 28.53%
- 3Y*
- 17.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.47%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
AMAGX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 15.11%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- 1Y
- 33.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- 17.87%
CSMCX vs. AMAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSMCX Congress Small Cap Growth Fund | 18.84% | 8.37% | 18.65% | 20.27% | -26.21% | 39.30% | 39.11% | 36.12% | 2.51% | 22.58% |
AMAGX Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares | 15.11% | 17.62% | 15.73% | 25.67% | -19.49% | 31.51% | 32.93% | 33.09% | 2.47% | 28.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSMCX and AMAGX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 1999 | 0.81 |
The correlation between CSMCX and AMAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSMCX vs. AMAGX — Risk / Return Rank
CSMCX
AMAGX
CSMCX vs. AMAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) and Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares (AMAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSMCX | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 3.16 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.26 | 13.55 | -6.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSMCX vs. AMAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSMCX drawdown since its inception was -56.20%, roughly equal to the maximum AMAGX drawdown of -57.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMCX and AMAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSMCX | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.20% | -57.64% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.63% | -11.04% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.10% | -21.45% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.44% | -28.09% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.44% | -28.09% | -5.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -1.96% | +1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -10.26% | +0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 2.57% | +1.65% |
Volatility
CSMCX vs. AMAGX - Volatility Comparison
Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) and Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares (AMAGX) have volatilities of 6.23% and 6.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSMCX | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 6.15% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.23% | 13.69% | +2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.67% | 16.92% | +4.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 18.55% | +4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 18.50% | +3.99% |
CSMCX vs. AMAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSMCX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than AMAGX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSMCX vs. AMAGX - Dividend Comparison
CSMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, while AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAGX Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.95% | 0.65% | 3.64% | 0.52% | 5.44% | 3.15% | 3.47% | 10.90% | 13.67% | 7.45% |
CSMCX Congress Small Cap Growth Fund | 1.97% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.57% | 7.05% | 16.14% | 10.04% | 11.48% | 0.00% | 27.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSMCX and AMAGX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSMCX has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to AMAGX (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSMCX dropped -56.20% vs AMAGX's -57.64%.
AMAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSMCX and AMAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer