PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSMCX vs. AMAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSMCX vs. AMAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) and Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares (AMAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSMCX achieves a 18.84% return, which is significantly higher than AMAGX's 15.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSMCX having a 17.39% annualized return and AMAGX not far ahead at 17.87%.


CSMCX

1D
-0.34%
1M
8.19%
YTD
18.84%
6M
15.45%
1Y
28.53%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
17.39%

AMAGX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.44%
YTD
15.11%
6M
14.45%
1Y
33.72%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
17.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSMCX vs. AMAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSMCX
Congress Small Cap Growth Fund
18.84%8.37%18.65%20.27%-26.21%39.30%39.11%36.12%2.51%22.58%
AMAGX
Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares
15.11%17.62%15.73%25.67%-19.49%31.51%32.93%33.09%2.47%28.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CSMCX and AMAGX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 1999

0.81

The correlation between CSMCX and AMAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSMCX vs. AMAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSMCX
CSMCX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CSMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CSMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAGX
AMAGX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
AMAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSMCX vs. AMAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) and Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares (AMAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSMCXAMAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

3.16

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.26

13.55

-6.28

CSMCX vs. AMAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the AMAGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSMCX and AMAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSMCX vs. AMAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSMCX drawdown since its inception was -56.20%, roughly equal to the maximum AMAGX drawdown of -57.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMCX and AMAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSMCXAMAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.20%

-57.64%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-11.04%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.10%

-21.45%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.44%

-28.09%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.44%

-28.09%

-5.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-1.96%

+1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-10.26%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

2.57%

+1.65%

Volatility

CSMCX vs. AMAGX - Volatility Comparison

Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) and Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares (AMAGX) have volatilities of 6.23% and 6.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSMCXAMAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

6.15%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.23%

13.69%

+2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.67%

16.92%

+4.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.68%

18.55%

+4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.49%

18.50%

+3.99%

CSMCX vs. AMAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSMCX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than AMAGX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSMCX vs. AMAGX - Dividend Comparison

CSMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, while AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMAGX
Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares
0.00%0.00%3.95%0.65%3.64%0.52%5.44%3.15%3.47%10.90%13.67%7.45%
CSMCX
Congress Small Cap Growth Fund
1.97%2.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%15.57%7.05%16.14%10.04%11.48%0.00%27.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSMCX and AMAGX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSMCX has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to AMAGX (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSMCX dropped -56.20% vs AMAGX's -57.64%.

AMAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSMCX and AMAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer