PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CSMCX vs. NEAGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CSMCXNEAGX
YTD Return18.91%8.30%
1Y Return34.74%24.16%
3Y Return (Ann)0.61%3.17%
5Y Return (Ann)16.10%19.32%
10Y Return (Ann)13.06%13.12%
Sharpe Ratio1.801.20
Sortino Ratio2.511.78
Omega Ratio1.311.21
Calmar Ratio1.241.55
Martin Ratio11.824.58
Ulcer Index2.88%5.78%
Daily Std Dev18.89%22.00%
Max Drawdown-56.20%-41.80%
Current Drawdown-1.24%-12.69%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between CSMCX and NEAGX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CSMCX vs. NEAGX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CSMCX achieves a 18.91% return, which is significantly higher than NEAGX's 8.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSMCX having a 13.06% annualized return and NEAGX not far ahead at 13.12%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.45%
-7.75%
CSMCX
NEAGX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CSMCX vs. NEAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSMCX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAGX's 1.86% expense ratio.


NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for NEAGX: current value at 1.86% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.86%
Expense ratio chart for CSMCX: current value at 1.00% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.00%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CSMCX vs. NEAGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSMCX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CSMCX, currently valued at 1.80, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.80
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CSMCX, currently valued at 2.51, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.51
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CSMCX, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CSMCX, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.24
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CSMCX, currently valued at 11.82, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0011.82
NEAGX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NEAGX, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.09
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NEAGX, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NEAGX, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NEAGX, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.40
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NEAGX, currently valued at 4.09, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.09

CSMCX vs. NEAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the NEAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSMCX and NEAGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.80
1.09
CSMCX
NEAGX

Dividends

CSMCX vs. NEAGX - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSMCX nor NEAGX has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CSMCX
Congress Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%15.57%7.05%8.07%10.04%11.48%0.00%27.40%17.61%4.94%
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%7.10%3.91%10.64%16.57%5.17%6.72%11.88%3.02%0.00%

Drawdowns

CSMCX vs. NEAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSMCX drawdown since its inception was -56.20%, which is greater than NEAGX's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMCX and NEAGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.24%
-12.69%
CSMCX
NEAGX

Volatility

CSMCX vs. NEAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) is 4.49%, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that CSMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.49%
4.95%
CSMCX
NEAGX