CSMCX vs. NEAGX

In the year-to-date period, CSMCX achieves a -4.78% return, which is significantly lower than NEAGX's -4.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CSMCX has underperformed NEAGX with an annualized return of 3.25%, while NEAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.30% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CSMCX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAGX's 1.86% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CSMCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the NEAGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSMCX and NEAGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither CSMCX nor NEAGX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CSMCX drawdown since its inception was -59.87%, which is greater than NEAGX's maximum drawdown of -53.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMCX and NEAGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) is 7.29%, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) has a volatility of 9.55%. This indicates that CSMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.