PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IITU.L vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IITU.L vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IITU.L is traded in GBp, while SMH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IITU.L achieves a 19.87% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 59.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IITU.L has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 26.95%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.20% annualized return.


IITU.L

1D
-2.75%
1M
8.94%
YTD
19.87%
6M
18.13%
1Y
48.11%
3Y*
30.28%
5Y*
24.80%
10Y*
26.95%

SMH

1D
-8.65%
1M
5.59%
YTD
59.78%
6M
56.71%
1Y
131.38%
3Y*
54.67%
5Y*
37.73%
10Y*
37.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IITU.L vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
19.87%14.44%40.85%50.70%-20.63%35.67%38.34%44.21%4.28%25.57%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
59.78%38.54%41.53%64.71%-25.63%43.48%50.97%58.19%-3.66%26.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IITU.L and SMH is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2015

0.56

The correlation between IITU.L and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

IITU.L vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IITU.L
SMH

Technology

99.6%
100.0%

Energy

0.1%

-

Industrials

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

IITU.L
99.6%
SMH
100.0%

Energy

IITU.L
0.1%
SMH

-

Industrials

IITU.L
0.0%
SMH

-

Basic Materials

IITU.L

-

SMH

-

Communication Services

IITU.L

-

SMH

-

Consumer Cyclical

IITU.L

-

SMH

-

Consumer Defensive

IITU.L

-

SMH

-

Financial Services

IITU.L

-

SMH

-

Healthcare

IITU.L

-

SMH

-

Real Estate

IITU.L

-

SMH

-

Utilities

IITU.L

-

SMH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IITU.L vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IITU.L vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IITU.LSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.63

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

10.56

-7.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

37.07

-29.72

IITU.L vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IITU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IITU.L and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IITU.LSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

4.29

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

1.12

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.15

1.17

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.82

+0.01

Drawdowns

IITU.L vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IITU.L drawdown since its inception was -41.09%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -47.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IITU.L and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IITU.LSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.09%

-47.21%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-12.51%

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.03%

-35.65%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.03%

-35.65%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.03%

-35.65%

+7.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-10.16%

+4.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-8.74%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.52%

3.56%

+2.96%

Volatility

IITU.L vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) is 7.64%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.11%. This indicates that IITU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IITU.LSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.64%

14.11%

-6.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.72%

24.82%

-10.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.82%

30.84%

-11.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.12%

33.70%

-7.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.63%

32.01%

-8.38%

IITU.L vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IITU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IITU.L vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.19%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


IITU.L and SMH have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

IITU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IITU.L and 0.35% for SMH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IITU.L and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer