PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IITU.L vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IITU.L vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IITU.L is traded in GBp, while COST is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COST values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IITU.L achieves a 19.87% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 14.16% return. Over the past 10 years, IITU.L has outperformed COST with an annualized return of 26.95%, while COST has yielded a comparatively lower 23.46% annualized return.


IITU.L

1D
-2.75%
1M
8.94%
YTD
19.87%
6M
18.13%
1Y
48.11%
3Y*
30.28%
5Y*
24.80%
10Y*
26.95%

COST

1D
0.58%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
14.16%
6M
8.86%
1Y
-1.62%
3Y*
22.19%
5Y*
22.95%
10Y*
23.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IITU.L vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
19.87%14.44%40.85%50.70%-20.63%35.67%38.34%44.21%4.28%25.57%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
14.16%-12.13%42.06%41.56%-9.42%53.26%28.77%40.16%17.16%11.79%

Correlation

The correlation between IITU.L and COST is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2015

0.29

The correlation between IITU.L and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IITU.L vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IITU.L vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IITU.LCOSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.00

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

-0.10

+2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

-0.25

+7.60

IITU.L vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IITU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IITU.L and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IITU.LCOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

-0.08

+2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

1.01

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.15

1.02

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.90

-0.07

Drawdowns

IITU.L vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IITU.L drawdown since its inception was -41.09%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -30.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IITU.L and COST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IITU.LCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.09%

-30.97%

-10.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-15.62%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.03%

-26.16%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.03%

-28.24%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.03%

-28.24%

+0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-14.56%

+9.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-7.04%

-1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.52%

6.61%

-0.09%

Volatility

IITU.L vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) is 7.64%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 8.45%. This indicates that IITU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IITU.LCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.64%

8.45%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.72%

15.76%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.82%

20.33%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.12%

22.84%

+3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.63%

23.04%

+0.59%

Dividends

IITU.L vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.55%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IITU.L and COST have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IITU.L and COST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer