IITU.L vs. BCHS.L

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and BCHS.L (Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - IITU.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index while BCHS.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IITU.L returned 23.93%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for BCHS.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IITU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BCHS.L.

Performance

IITU.L vs. BCHS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IITU.L achieves a 17.69% return, which is significantly lower than BCHS.L's 25.35% return.

IITU.L

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 17.69%
• 6M: 18.41%
• 1Y: 45.48%
• 3Y*: 28.72%
• 5Y*: 23.93%
• 10Y*: 26.66%

BCHS.L

• 1D: 5.50%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 25.35%
• 6M: 18.40%
• 1Y: 56.79%
• 3Y*: 41.92%
• 5Y*: 12.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IITU.L vs. BCHS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	17.69%	14.44%	40.85%	50.70%	-20.63%	35.67%	38.34%	31.17%
BCHS.L Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc	25.35%	35.24%	18.50%	58.28%	-46.25%	26.00%	89.05%	-12.06%

Correlation

The correlation between IITU.L and BCHS.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019	0.58

The correlation between IITU.L and BCHS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

IITU.L vs. BCHS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IITU.L	BCHS.L
Technology	99.5%	30.8%
Energy	0.1%	0.0%
Industrials	0.0%	0.5%
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Communication Services	-	3.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Financial Services	-	57.6%
Healthcare	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	1.3%

Return for Risk

IITU.L vs. BCHS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IITU.L

IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 47

BCHS.L

BCHS.L Risk / Return Rank: 39
BCHS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
BCHS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
BCHS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 38
BCHS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
BCHS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IITU.L vs. BCHS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IITU.L	BCHS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	1.37	+0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	1.92	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.23	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	1.80	+0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.67	3.63	+3.04

IITU.L vs. BCHS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IITU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the BCHS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IITU.L and BCHS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IITU.L vs. BCHS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IITU.L drawdown since its inception was -41.09%, smaller than the maximum BCHS.L drawdown of -55.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IITU.L and BCHS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IITU.L	BCHS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.09%	-55.89%	+14.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.76%	-29.49%	+12.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.03%	-35.64%	+7.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.03%	-55.89%	+27.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.27%	-4.94%	-2.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.11%	-23.07%	+14.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.63%	14.64%	-8.01%

Volatility

IITU.L vs. BCHS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) is 8.62%, while Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) has a volatility of 12.78%. This indicates that IITU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCHS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IITU.L	BCHS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.62%	12.78%	-4.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.42%	26.27%	-10.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.37%	38.60%	-18.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.20%	38.27%	-12.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.68%	36.52%	-12.84%

IITU.L vs. BCHS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IITU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BCHS.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

IITU.L vs. BCHS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IITU.L nor BCHS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IITU.L and BCHS.L in my portfolio?

IITU.L and BCHS.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IITU.L or BCHS.L?

On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IITU.L or BCHS.L?

IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BCHS.L.

What is the main difference between IITU.L and BCHS.L?

IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while BCHS.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IITU.L and 0.65% for BCHS.L.