IIRLX vs. VGSBX
IIRLX (Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio) and VGSBX (VY BrandywineGLOBAL - Bond Portfolio) are both mutual funds - IIRLX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Voya, while VGSBX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Voya. Over the past 10 years, IIRLX returned 16.29%/yr vs 2.79%/yr for VGSBX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IIRLX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for VGSBX.
Performance
IIRLX vs. VGSBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IIRLX achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly higher than VGSBX's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, IIRLX has outperformed VGSBX with an annualized return of 16.29%, while VGSBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.79% annualized return.
IIRLX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 7.53%
- 1Y
- 25.20%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- 16.29%
VGSBX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 3.32%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 2.79%
IIRLX vs. VGSBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIRLX Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio | 8.47% | 18.77% | 26.95% | 29.41% | -20.07% | 27.26% | 21.71% | 31.18% | -3.45% | 22.58% |
VGSBX VY BrandywineGLOBAL - Bond Portfolio | 0.96% | 6.12% | 0.68% | 5.65% | -11.86% | 1.15% | 17.48% | 10.01% | -1.55% | 2.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between IIRLX and VGSBX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.05 |
The correlation between IIRLX and VGSBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IIRLX vs. VGSBX — Risk / Return Rank
IIRLX
VGSBX
IIRLX vs. VGSBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX) and VY BrandywineGLOBAL - Bond Portfolio (VGSBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IIRLX | VGSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.27 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 3.07 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.29 | 9.75 | +2.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IIRLX vs. VGSBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIRLX drawdown since its inception was -50.33%, which is greater than VGSBX's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIRLX and VGSBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIRLX | VGSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.33% | -18.20% | -32.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.83% | -1.79% | -8.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.58% | -10.28% | -9.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.83% | -18.20% | -7.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.60% | -18.20% | -14.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -0.21% | -2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -3.43% | -3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 0.55% | +1.71% |
Volatility
IIRLX vs. VGSBX - Volatility Comparison
Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to VY BrandywineGLOBAL - Bond Portfolio (VGSBX) at 0.65%. This indicates that IIRLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGSBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IIRLX | VGSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 0.65% | +4.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.51% | 2.72% | +8.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.24% | 4.62% | +9.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 7.94% | +9.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 6.25% | +12.32% |
IIRLX vs. VGSBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIRLX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than VGSBX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
IIRLX vs. VGSBX - Dividend Comparison
IIRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than VGSBX's 3.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIRLX Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio | 4.88% | 3.76% | 0.96% | 1.14% | 5.04% | 4.77% | 4.71% | 4.35% | 1.73% | 1.47% | 1.77% | 1.66% |
VGSBX VY BrandywineGLOBAL - Bond Portfolio | 3.89% | 3.93% | 4.56% | 2.18% | 6.85% | 8.48% | 2.48% | 1.89% | 2.29% | 2.31% | 2.34% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IIRLX and VGSBX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IIRLX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to VGSBX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIRLX dropped -50.33% vs VGSBX's -18.20%.
IIRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IIRLX and VGSBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer