PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IIP-UN.TO vs. PSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IIP-UN.TO vs. PSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust (IIP-UN.TO) and Public Storage (PSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IIP-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while PSA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PSA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIP-UN.TO achieves a -1.74% return, which is significantly lower than PSA's 19.05% return. Over the past 10 years, IIP-UN.TO has outperformed PSA with an annualized return of 7.78%, while PSA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.40% annualized return.


IIP-UN.TO

1D
-0.78%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
-1.74%
6M
-1.57%
1Y
-3.10%
3Y*
1.55%
5Y*
-1.17%
10Y*
7.78%

PSA

1D
1.36%
1M
3.11%
YTD
19.05%
6M
10.99%
1Y
5.44%
3Y*
7.02%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
6.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IIP-UN.TO vs. PSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IIP-UN.TO
InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust
-1.74%34.25%-20.84%6.33%-24.09%29.06%-10.48%22.25%46.53%26.20%
PSA
Public Storage
19.05%-13.83%10.86%11.10%-14.51%65.12%10.79%3.61%9.16%-9.08%

Correlation

The correlation between IIP-UN.TO and PSA is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009

0.18

The correlation between IIP-UN.TO and PSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IIP-UN.TO:

CA$1.79B

PSA:

$53.12B

EPS

IIP-UN.TO:

CA$0.03

PSA:

$10.84

PE Ratio

IIP-UN.TO:

385.90

PSA:

27.87

PS Ratio

IIP-UN.TO:

7.24

PSA:

10.93

PB Ratio

IIP-UN.TO:

0.79

PSA:

5.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

IIP-UN.TO:

CA$247.25M

PSA:

$4.86B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IIP-UN.TO:

CA$169.56M

PSA:

$2.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

IIP-UN.TO:

CA$67.56M

PSA:

$3.38B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IIP-UN.TO vs. PSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIP-UN.TO
IIP-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
IIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIP-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIP-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
IIP-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIP-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

PSA
PSA Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IIP-UN.TO vs. PSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust (IIP-UN.TO) and Public Storage (PSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IIP-UN.TOPSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.06

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

0.28

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.42

0.63

-3.05

IIP-UN.TO vs. PSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the PSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIP-UN.TO and PSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IIP-UN.TOPSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.84

0.23

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.37

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.28

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.70

-0.61

Drawdowns

IIP-UN.TO vs. PSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIP-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.60%, which is greater than PSA's maximum drawdown of -33.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIP-UN.TO and PSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIP-UN.TOPSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.60%

-33.23%

-46.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.00%

-18.05%

+14.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.80%

-24.49%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.92%

-31.46%

-11.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.92%

-32.08%

-10.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.04%

-9.77%

-11.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.47%

-10.33%

-17.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

8.13%

-6.85%

Volatility

IIP-UN.TO vs. PSA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust (IIP-UN.TO) is 1.68%, while Public Storage (PSA) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that IIP-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIP-UN.TOPSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

7.45%

-5.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

17.70%

-14.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.71%

22.33%

-18.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.65%

22.71%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.40%

22.89%

-0.49%

Dividends

IIP-UN.TO vs. PSA - Dividend Comparison

IIP-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than PSA's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IIP-UN.TO
InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust
3.10%3.01%3.76%2.74%2.70%1.90%2.28%1.88%2.09%2.71%3.12%3.38%
PSA
Public Storage
3.97%4.62%4.01%3.93%7.55%2.14%3.46%3.76%3.95%3.83%3.27%2.62%

Financials

IIP-UN.TO vs. PSA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust and Public Storage. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
60.89M
1.22B
(IIP-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(PSA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. IIP-UN.TO values in CAD, PSA values in USD

IIP-UN.TO vs. PSA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust and Public Storage over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
63.4%
72.1%
Portfolio components
IIP-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 38.58M and revenue of 60.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.4%.

PSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Public Storage reported a gross profit of 877.80M and revenue of 1.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.

IIP-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 18.73M and revenue of 60.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.8%.

PSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Public Storage reported an operating income of 474.28M and revenue of 1.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.0%.

IIP-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of -4.05M and revenue of 60.89M, resulting in a net margin of -6.6%.

PSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Public Storage reported a net income of 529.38M and revenue of 1.22B, resulting in a net margin of 43.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IIP-UN.TO and PSA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IIP-UN.TO and PSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer