IIND.L vs. XCX5.L
IIND.L (iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XCX5.L (Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both India Equities funds tracking the MSCI India NR USD, from iShares and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IIND.L returned 5.16%/yr vs 4.57%/yr for XCX5.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IIND.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XCX5.L.
Performance
IIND.L vs. XCX5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IIND.L is traded in GBP, while XCX5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XCX5.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IIND.L achieves a -9.63% return, which is significantly higher than XCX5.L's -10.21% return.
IIND.L
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- 6M
- -7.85%
- YTD
- -9.63%
- 1Y
- -10.85%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- —
XCX5.L
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- 6M
- -8.11%
- YTD
- -10.21%
- 1Y
- -12.29%
- 3Y*
- 2.85%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- 6.39%
IIND.L vs. XCX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIND.L iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -9.63% | -2.94% | 11.13% | 12.43% | 2.72% | 26.95% | 10.48% | 3.72% | -21.95% |
XCX5.L Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -10.21% | -5.16% | 11.92% | 12.56% | 2.33% | 26.19% | 9.49% | 2.58% | 3.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between IIND.L and XCX5.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2018 | 0.97 |
The correlation between IIND.L and XCX5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
IIND.L vs. XCX5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IIND.L
XCX5.L
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IIND.L
XCX5.L
Consumer Cyclical
IIND.L
XCX5.L
Industrials
IIND.L
XCX5.L
Energy
IIND.L
XCX5.L
Basic Materials
IIND.L
XCX5.L
Technology
IIND.L
XCX5.L
Healthcare
IIND.L
XCX5.L
Consumer Defensive
IIND.L
XCX5.L
Communication Services
IIND.L
XCX5.L
Utilities
IIND.L
XCX5.L
Real Estate
IIND.L
XCX5.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IIND.L vs. XCX5.L — Risk / Return Rank
IIND.L
XCX5.L
IIND.L vs. XCX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IIND.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.89 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | -0.62 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | -1.24 | +0.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IIND.L vs. XCX5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIND.L drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, which is greater than XCX5.L's maximum drawdown of -41.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIND.L and XCX5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIND.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.07% | -41.66% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.76% | -19.88% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.81% | -26.47% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.81% | -26.47% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.89% | -20.86% | +1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.09% | -12.20% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.98% | 9.87% | +0.11% |
Volatility
IIND.L vs. XCX5.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L) is 4.24%, while Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that IIND.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCX5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IIND.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 4.49% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.77% | 13.75% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.20% | 16.29% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 21.22% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.90% | 22.11% | +2.79% |
IIND.L vs. XCX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIND.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than XCX5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IIND.L vs. XCX5.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IIND.L nor XCX5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IIND.L and XCX5.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IIND.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IIND.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XCX5.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI India NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IIND.L and 0.75% for XCX5.L.
Find the right allocation for IIND.L and XCX5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer