IIND.L vs. CES1.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IIND.L (iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CES1.L (iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IIND.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India NR USD, while CES1.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IIND.L returned 4.52%/yr vs 6.70%/yr for CES1.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IIND.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for CES1.L.

Performance

IIND.L vs. CES1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L) and iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CES1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IIND.L is traded in GBP, while CES1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CES1.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIND.L achieves a -13.04% return, which is significantly lower than CES1.L's 10.08% return.

IIND.L

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: -1.77%
• YTD: -13.04%
• 6M: -13.23%
• 1Y: -11.37%
• 3Y*: 2.69%
• 5Y*: 4.52%
• 10Y*: —

CES1.L

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 10.08%
• 6M: 12.64%
• 1Y: 20.42%
• 3Y*: 13.56%
• 5Y*: 6.70%
• 10Y*: 10.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IIND.L vs. CES1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IIND.L iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	-13.04%	-2.93%	11.04%	12.49%	2.72%	26.95%	10.48%	3.72%	3.78%
CES1.L iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)	10.08%	30.70%	-4.07%	11.92%	-11.62%	15.21%	11.44%	21.04%	-15.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IIND.L and CES1.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2018	0.43

The correlation between IIND.L and CES1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IIND.L vs. CES1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IIND.L	CES1.L
Financial Services	28.3%	9.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	13.1%
Industrials	10.3%	28.9%
Energy	9.5%	5.9%
Technology	8.3%	10.6%
Basic Materials	8.0%	10.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	2.4%
Healthcare	6.2%	4.5%
Communication Services	4.7%	4.0%
Utilities	4.6%	3.7%
Real Estate	1.4%	7.2%

Return for Risk

IIND.L vs. CES1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIND.L

IIND.L Risk / Return Rank: 3
IIND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
IIND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
IIND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3
IIND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
IIND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CES1.L

CES1.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
CES1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
CES1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
CES1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
CES1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
CES1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IIND.L vs. CES1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L) and iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CES1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IIND.L	CES1.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.72	1.51	-2.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.96	2.14	-3.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.28	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.57	1.74	-2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.28	6.55	-7.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IIND.L vs. CES1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIND.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the CES1.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIND.L and CES1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IIND.L	CES1.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.72	1.51	-2.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.42	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.66	-0.36

Drawdowns

IIND.L vs. CES1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIND.L drawdown since its inception was -36.72%, which is greater than CES1.L's maximum drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIND.L and CES1.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IIND.L	CES1.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.72%	-32.68%	-4.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.77%	-11.66%	-8.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.77%	-13.92%	-10.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.77%	-27.02%	+2.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.93%	-1.41%	-20.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.75%	-6.07%	-1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.85%	3.11%	+5.74%

Volatility

IIND.L vs. CES1.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CES1.L) at 4.07%. This indicates that IIND.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CES1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IIND.L	CES1.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.07%	4.07%	+2.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.29%	11.17%	+2.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.71%	13.43%	+2.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.11%	16.10%	+0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.76%	16.01%	+4.75%

IIND.L vs. CES1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IIND.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CES1.L's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

IIND.L vs. CES1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IIND.L nor CES1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IIND.L and CES1.L in my portfolio?

IIND.L and CES1.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IIND.L or CES1.L?

On fees, CES1.L is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IIND.L or CES1.L?

CES1.L is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IIND.L.

What is the main difference between IIND.L and CES1.L?

IIND.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while CES1.L is Europe Equities. IIND.L tracks MSCI India NR USD, while CES1.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IIND.L and 0.58% for CES1.L.