PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
III vs. CHAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

III vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Information Services Group, Inc. (III) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, III achieves a -28.36% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 63.45% return.


III

1D
1.50%
1M
-7.83%
YTD
-28.36%
6M
-30.29%
1Y
-10.06%
3Y*
-6.29%
5Y*
-2.44%
10Y*
2.64%

CHAT

1D
-7.40%
1M
7.27%
YTD
63.45%
6M
62.78%
1Y
115.67%
3Y*
51.32%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

III vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
III
Information Services Group, Inc.
-28.36%79.78%-25.34%-8.26%
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
63.45%49.85%30.98%21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between III and CHAT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

III vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

III
III Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
III Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
III Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
III Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
III Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
III Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

III vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Information Services Group, Inc. (III) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IIICHATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.49

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

7.14

-7.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.52

19.81

-20.33

III vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current III Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of III and CHAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

III vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum III drawdown since its inception was -88.55%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for III and CHAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIICHATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.55%

-31.34%

-57.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.63%

-16.28%

-21.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.79%

-31.34%

-14.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.45%

-7.40%

-42.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.05%

-5.38%

-47.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.31%

5.86%

+13.45%

Volatility

III vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Information Services Group, Inc. (III) is 8.87%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 19.25%. This indicates that III experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIICHATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.87%

19.25%

-10.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.24%

29.60%

-2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.71%

34.87%

+4.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.14%

31.22%

+9.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.47%

31.22%

+14.25%

Dividends

III vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

III's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than CHAT's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
1.74%2.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
III
Information Services Group, Inc.
4.44%3.11%5.39%3.72%3.26%1.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


III and CHAT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHAT has higher volatility (19.25%) compared to III (8.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, III dropped -88.55% vs CHAT's -31.34%.

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for III and CHAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer