PortfoliosLab logo
AMG vs. MSFT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AMG and MSFT is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

AMG vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMG:

0.31

MSFT:

0.47

Sortino Ratio

AMG:

0.66

MSFT:

0.62

Omega Ratio

AMG:

1.09

MSFT:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

AMG:

0.29

MSFT:

0.33

Martin Ratio

AMG:

1.03

MSFT:

0.73

Ulcer Index

AMG:

9.76%

MSFT:

10.70%

Daily Std Dev

AMG:

31.18%

MSFT:

25.79%

Max Drawdown

AMG:

-85.93%

MSFT:

-69.39%

Current Drawdown

AMG:

-20.28%

MSFT:

-0.79%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMG:

$5.04B

MSFT:

$3.42T

EPS

AMG:

$13.09

MSFT:

$12.98

PE Ratio

AMG:

13.45

MSFT:

35.47

PEG Ratio

AMG:

0.60

MSFT:

2.16

PS Ratio

AMG:

2.47

MSFT:

12.67

PB Ratio

AMG:

1.58

MSFT:

10.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMG:

$2.03B

MSFT:

$270.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMG:

$1.13B

MSFT:

$186.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMG:

$953.60M

MSFT:

$150.06B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMG achieves a -4.81% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's 9.64% return. Over the past 10 years, AMG has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of -2.10%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 27.46% annualized return.


AMG

YTD

-4.81%

1M

5.45%

6M

-6.14%

1Y

8.27%

3Y*

9.65%

5Y*

21.48%

10Y*

-2.10%

MSFT

YTD

9.64%

1M

8.42%

6M

9.13%

1Y

11.75%

3Y*

20.19%

5Y*

21.26%

10Y*

27.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.

Microsoft Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMG vs. MSFT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMG is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMG is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMG is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMG is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMG is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMG is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSFT is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSFT is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSFT is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMG vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AMG Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMG and MSFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

AMG vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

AMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than MSFT's 0.70% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.34%1.51%1.23%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%2.48%

Drawdowns

AMG vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMG drawdown since its inception was -85.93%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMG and MSFT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

AMG vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) have volatilities of 8.05% and 8.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

AMG vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
496.60M
70.07B
(AMG) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMG vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
53.6%
68.7%
(AMG) Gross Margin
(MSFT) Gross Margin
AMG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 266.30M and revenue of 496.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.6%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 48.15B and revenue of 70.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.7%.

AMG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 85.50M and revenue of 496.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.2%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 32.00B and revenue of 70.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.7%.

AMG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. reported a net income of 99.20M and revenue of 496.60M, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 25.82B and revenue of 70.07B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.