PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
III.L vs. TDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

III.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in 3I Group plc (III.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

III.L is traded in GBp, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, III.L achieves a -32.88% return, which is significantly lower than TDGB.L's 8.92% return.


III.L

1D
2.77%
1M
-17.93%
YTD
-32.88%
6M
-32.22%
1Y
-46.08%
3Y*
6.24%
5Y*
15.02%
10Y*
18.20%

TDGB.L

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
8.92%
6M
11.77%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

III.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
III.L
3I Group plc
-32.88%-6.44%50.11%85.46%-3.46%28.99%9.36%35.65%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
8.92%30.88%10.65%9.06%22.49%19.59%-5.61%10.74%

Correlation

The correlation between III.L and TDGB.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between III.L and TDGB.L has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

III.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

III.L
III.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
III.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
III.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
III.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
III.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
III.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

III.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3I Group plc (III.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


III.LTDGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.59

-0.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

6.26

-7.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.80

20.72

-22.51

III.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current III.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of III.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


III.LTDGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.06

3.15

-4.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

1.55

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.98

-0.62

Drawdowns

III.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum III.L drawdown since its inception was -84.42%, which is greater than TDGB.L's maximum drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for III.L and TDGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


III.LTDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.42%

-29.60%

-54.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.78%

-4.66%

-48.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.78%

-12.41%

-40.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.78%

-12.41%

-40.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.33%

-1.47%

-48.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.70%

-3.70%

-23.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.74%

1.41%

+24.33%

Volatility

III.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

3I Group plc (III.L) has a higher volatility of 19.25% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 2.49%. This indicates that III.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


III.LTDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.25%

2.49%

+16.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.71%

7.01%

+30.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.56%

9.28%

+34.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.83%

11.42%

+19.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.38%

14.44%

+15.94%

Dividends

III.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

III.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than TDGB.L's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
III.L
3I Group plc
3.61%2.42%1.82%2.32%3.76%2.78%3.02%3.42%3.75%1.75%2.64%1.68%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.20%3.50%4.27%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


III.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for III.L and TDGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer