III.L vs. LRN
III.L (3I Group plc) and LRN (Stride, Inc.) are both stocks. III.L operates in Investment Banking & Investment Services (Financial Services), while LRN operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, III.L returned 19.84%/yr vs 24.44%/yr for LRN. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
III.L vs. LRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
III.L is traded in GBp, while LRN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LRN values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, III.L achieves a -29.24% return, which is significantly lower than LRN's 51.25% return. Over the past 10 years, III.L has underperformed LRN with an annualized return of 19.84%, while LRN has yielded a comparatively higher 24.44% annualized return.
III.L
- 1D
- 3.78%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- -29.24%
- 6M
- -26.18%
- 1Y
- -43.66%
- 3Y*
- 7.01%
- 5Y*
- 16.34%
- 10Y*
- 19.84%
LRN
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- 11.84%
- YTD
- 51.25%
- 6M
- 51.11%
- 1Y
- -30.08%
- 3Y*
- 31.20%
- 5Y*
- 27.58%
- 10Y*
- 24.44%
III.L vs. LRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
III.L 3I Group plc | -29.24% | -6.44% | 50.11% | 85.46% | -3.46% | 28.99% | 9.36% | 47.12% | -11.76% | 33.70% |
LRN Stride, Inc. | 51.25% | -41.98% | 78.11% | 80.32% | 5.01% | 58.48% | 1.26% | -21.03% | 65.16% | -15.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between III.L and LRN is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
III.L:
£23.50B
LRN:
$4.65B
III.L:
£10.41
LRN:
$9.68
III.L:
2.22
LRN:
10.10
III.L:
0.27
LRN:
0.25
III.L:
10.82
LRN:
1.86
III.L:
0.76
LRN:
2.83
III.L:
£2.12B
LRN:
$2.54B
III.L:
£5.57B
LRN:
$972.24M
III.L:
£9.82B
LRN:
$424.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
III.L vs. LRN — Risk / Return Rank
III.L
LRN
III.L vs. LRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3I Group plc (III.L) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| III.L | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.98 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | -0.47 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.63 | -0.72 | -0.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
III.L vs. LRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum III.L drawdown since its inception was -84.90%, which is greater than LRN's maximum drawdown of -78.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for III.L and LRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| III.L | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.90% | -78.88% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.78% | -63.65% | +10.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.78% | -63.65% | +10.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.78% | -63.65% | +10.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.78% | -63.65% | +10.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.63% | -42.13% | -5.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.08% | -32.95% | +9.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.82% | 41.90% | -15.08% |
Volatility
III.L vs. LRN - Volatility Comparison
3I Group plc (III.L) has a higher volatility of 19.01% compared to Stride, Inc. (LRN) at 8.08%. This indicates that III.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| III.L | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.01% | 8.08% | +10.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.16% | 24.16% | +13.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.35% | 66.67% | -23.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.78% | 51.80% | -21.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.35% | 49.76% | -19.41% |
Dividends
III.L vs. LRN - Dividend Comparison
III.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, while LRN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
III.L 3I Group plc | 3.42% | 2.42% | 1.82% | 2.32% | 3.76% | 2.78% | 3.02% | 3.42% | 4.78% | 2.90% | 3.41% | 2.37% |
LRN Stride, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
III.L vs. LRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3I Group plc and Stride, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
III.L and LRN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for III.L and LRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer