IIGD vs. QCON
IIGD (Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. IIGD is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. IIGD charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
IIGD vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IIGD
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 4.13%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- —
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IIGD vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IIGD Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF | -0.20% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
IIGD vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IIGD
QCON
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Financial Services
IIGD
QCON
Industrials
IIGD
QCON
Technology
IIGD
QCON
-
Consumer Defensive
IIGD
QCON
-
Healthcare
IIGD
QCON
-
Energy
IIGD
QCON
-
Consumer Cyclical
IIGD
QCON
-
Real Estate
IIGD
QCON
-
Communication Services
IIGD
QCON
-
Basic Materials
IIGD
QCON
-
Utilities
IIGD
QCON
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IIGD vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank
IIGD
QCON
IIGD vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IIGD | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.72 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IIGD | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | — | — |
Drawdowns
IIGD vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIGD drawdown since its inception was -11.43%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIGD and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIGD | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | 0.00% | -11.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | 0.00% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | 0.00% | -2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.47% | — | — |
Volatility
IIGD vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IIGD | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29% | 0.00% | +2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.66% | 0.00% | +3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 0.00% | +3.70% |
IIGD vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIGD has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
IIGD vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
IIGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIGD Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF | 4.28% | 4.25% | 4.13% | 3.74% | 1.73% | 1.77% | 3.21% | 2.44% | 1.23% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, IIGD is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IIGD is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.
IIGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for IIGD and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for IIGD and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer