PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IIGD vs. QCON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IIGD vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IIGD

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.49%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*

QCON

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IIGD vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison


IIGD vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IIGD
QCON

Financial Services

16.7%
7.9%

Industrials

11.6%
1.0%

Technology

8.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.6%

-

Healthcare

5.5%

-

Energy

5.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%

-

Real Estate

3.0%

-

Communication Services

2.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Utilities

1.3%
1.5%

Financial Services

IIGD
16.7%
QCON
7.9%

Industrials

IIGD
11.6%
QCON
1.0%

Technology

IIGD
8.7%
QCON

-

Consumer Defensive

IIGD
5.6%
QCON

-

Healthcare

IIGD
5.5%
QCON

-

Energy

IIGD
5.5%
QCON

-

Consumer Cyclical

IIGD
3.0%
QCON

-

Real Estate

IIGD
3.0%
QCON

-

Communication Services

IIGD
2.4%
QCON

-

Basic Materials

IIGD
1.8%
QCON

-

Utilities

IIGD
1.3%
QCON
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IIGD vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIGD
IIGD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IIGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIGD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IIGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIGD Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

QCON
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IIGD vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IIGDQCONDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

IIGD vs. QCON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IIGDQCONDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

Drawdowns

IIGD vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIGD drawdown since its inception was -11.43%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIGD and QCON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIGDQCONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.43%

0.00%

-11.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

0.00%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

0.00%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

Volatility

IIGD vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIGDQCONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29%

0.00%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.66%

0.00%

+3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.70%

0.00%

+3.70%

IIGD vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

IIGD has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

IIGD vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

IIGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IIGD
Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF
4.28%4.25%4.13%3.74%1.73%1.77%3.21%2.44%1.23%
QCON
American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, IIGD is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IIGD is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

IIGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for IIGD and 0.32% for QCON.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IIGD and QCON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer