IIF vs. EDD
IIF (Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund) and EDD (Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund) are both mutual funds - IIF is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Morgan Stanley, while EDD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Morgan Stanley. Over the past 10 years, IIF returned 8.80%/yr vs 5.80%/yr for EDD. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IIF charges 0.01%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for EDD.
Performance
IIF vs. EDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IIF achieves a -9.25% return, which is significantly lower than EDD's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, IIF has outperformed EDD with an annualized return of 8.80%, while EDD has yielded a comparatively lower 5.80% annualized return.
IIF
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- -9.25%
- 6M
- -10.64%
- 1Y
- -11.20%
- 3Y*
- 13.71%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
EDD
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 6.74%
- 1Y
- 22.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- 5.80%
IIF vs. EDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIF Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund | -9.25% | 6.71% | 29.65% | 21.43% | -9.55% | 30.87% | 6.66% | -0.66% | -21.25% | 49.89% |
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund | 8.70% | 32.46% | 8.64% | 14.09% | -14.15% | -7.03% | -2.84% | 25.45% | -14.09% | 16.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between IIF and EDD is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2007 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IIF vs. EDD — Risk / Return Rank
IIF
EDD
IIF vs. EDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund (IIF) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IIF | EDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.25 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 1.28 | -1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 4.09 | -5.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IIF vs. EDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIF drawdown since its inception was -62.11%, roughly equal to the maximum EDD drawdown of -59.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIF and EDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIF | EDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.11% | -59.38% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.05% | -17.67% | -6.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.05% | -17.67% | -6.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.05% | -32.04% | +7.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.05% | -42.70% | -16.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.74% | -4.33% | -9.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.77% | -24.18% | +4.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.75% | 5.51% | +5.24% |
Volatility
IIF vs. EDD - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund (IIF) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) at 4.25%. This indicates that IIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IIF | EDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 4.25% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.79% | 13.20% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 16.39% | -0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 15.41% | +0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 17.66% | +2.13% |
IIF vs. EDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIF has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than EDD's 2.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IIF vs. EDD - Dividend Comparison
IIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.76%, less than EDD's 8.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund | 8.89% | 9.76% | 11.45% | 7.30% | 6.82% | 6.93% | 6.92% | 8.15% | 9.90% | 8.18% | 10.32% | 12.65% |
IIF Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund | 8.76% | 7.95% | 10.67% | 14.61% | 19.62% | 3.75% | 0.02% | 0.14% | 30.40% | 15.23% | 4.46% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IIF and EDD have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IIF has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to EDD (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIF dropped -62.11% vs EDD's -59.38%.
EDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IIF and EDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer