IIBAX vs. LCTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Voya Intermediate Bond Fund (IIBAX) and Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX).
IIBAX is managed by Voya. It was launched on Dec 15, 1998. LCTRX is managed by LEADER. It was launched on Jul 30, 2010.
Performance
IIBAX vs. LCTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IIBAX vs. LCTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIBAX Voya Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.45% | 6.42% | 2.65% | 7.04% | -15.11% | -1.79% | 7.75% | 9.57% | -0.59% | 4.48% |
LCTRX Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares | -0.02% | 4.72% | 6.03% | 8.26% | 2.22% | 1.99% | 12.07% | 1.15% | 6.01% | 4.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IIBAX achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than LCTRX's -0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, IIBAX has underperformed LCTRX with an annualized return of 1.86%, while LCTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.03% annualized return.
IIBAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 2.87%
- 3Y*
- 3.95%
- 5Y*
- 0.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.86%
LCTRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 3.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.94%
- 10Y*
- 5.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IIBAX vs. LCTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIBAX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than LCTRX's 2.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IIBAX vs. LCTRX — Risk / Return Rank
IIBAX
LCTRX
IIBAX vs. LCTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Intermediate Bond Fund (IIBAX) and Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IIBAX | LCTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 1.80 | -1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 3.45 | -2.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.62 | -0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 3.22 | -2.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 10.58 | -8.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IIBAX | LCTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 1.80 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 2.02 | -2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.80 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.68 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between IIBAX and LCTRX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IIBAX vs. LCTRX - Dividend Comparison
IIBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than LCTRX's 5.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIBAX Voya Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.19% | 3.43% | 4.50% | 4.05% | 1.98% | 2.03% | 4.69% | 3.23% | 2.93% | 2.88% | 2.96% | 2.45% |
LCTRX Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares | 5.01% | 5.53% | 5.57% | 5.31% | 2.18% | 1.69% | 1.17% | 2.40% | 3.31% | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IIBAX vs. LCTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIBAX drawdown since its inception was -20.34%, smaller than the maximum LCTRX drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIBAX and LCTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIBAX | LCTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.34% | -26.09% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.05% | -1.17% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.01% | -3.82% | -16.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.34% | -23.93% | +3.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -1.17% | -1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -4.16% | +1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 0.36% | +0.76% |
Volatility
IIBAX vs. LCTRX - Volatility Comparison
Voya Intermediate Bond Fund (IIBAX) has a higher volatility of 1.77% compared to Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) at 0.55%. This indicates that IIBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IIBAX | LCTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.77% | 0.55% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 1.32% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.89% | 1.90% | +2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 2.47% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 6.32% | -1.32% |