PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IIBAX vs. IMCDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IIBAX vs. IMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Intermediate Bond Fund (IIBAX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IIBAX

1D
0.23%
1M
0.94%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.78%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
4.49%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*
1.80%

IMCDX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IIBAX vs. IMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IIBAX
Voya Intermediate Bond Fund
0.41%6.42%2.65%7.04%-15.11%-1.79%7.75%9.57%-0.59%4.48%
IMCDX
Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund
0.00%0.00%6.44%8.51%-13.79%0.08%8.35%13.65%-1.77%9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IIBAX and IMCDX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2012

0.40

The correlation between IIBAX and IMCDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.52 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IIBAX vs. IMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIBAX
IIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCDX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IIBAX vs. IMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Intermediate Bond Fund (IIBAX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IIBAXIMCDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.04

IIBAX vs. IMCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IIBAX vs. IMCDX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIBAXIMCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

Volatility

IIBAX vs. IMCDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIBAXIMCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.04%

IIBAX vs. IMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IIBAX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCDX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

IIBAX vs. IMCDX - Dividend Comparison

IIBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, while IMCDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IIBAX
Voya Intermediate Bond Fund
3.59%3.43%4.50%4.05%1.98%2.03%4.69%3.23%2.93%2.88%2.96%2.45%
IMCDX
Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund
0.00%0.00%4.08%4.21%3.80%6.14%4.64%4.99%5.30%4.79%5.22%5.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


IIBAX and IMCDX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IIBAX and IMCDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer