IIBAX vs. IMCDX
IIBAX (Voya Intermediate Bond Fund) and IMCDX (Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund) are both mutual funds - IIBAX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Voya, while IMCDX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Voya. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IIBAX charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IMCDX.
Performance
IIBAX vs. IMCDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IIBAX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- 4.49%
- 5Y*
- -0.10%
- 10Y*
- 1.80%
IMCDX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IIBAX vs. IMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIBAX Voya Intermediate Bond Fund | 0.41% | 6.42% | 2.65% | 7.04% | -15.11% | -1.79% | 7.75% | 9.57% | -0.59% | 4.48% |
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.44% | 8.51% | -13.79% | 0.08% | 8.35% | 13.65% | -1.77% | 9.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between IIBAX and IMCDX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2012 | 0.40 |
The correlation between IIBAX and IMCDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.52 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IIBAX vs. IMCDX — Risk / Return Rank
IIBAX
IMCDX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IIBAX vs. IMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Intermediate Bond Fund (IIBAX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IIBAX | IMCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.04 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IIBAX vs. IMCDX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIBAX | IMCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | — | — |
Volatility
IIBAX vs. IMCDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IIBAX | IMCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.00% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.04% | — | — |
IIBAX vs. IMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIBAX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCDX's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
IIBAX vs. IMCDX - Dividend Comparison
IIBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, while IMCDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIBAX Voya Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.59% | 3.43% | 4.50% | 4.05% | 1.98% | 2.03% | 4.69% | 3.23% | 2.93% | 2.88% | 2.96% | 2.45% |
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.08% | 4.21% | 3.80% | 6.14% | 4.64% | 4.99% | 5.30% | 4.79% | 5.22% | 5.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IIBAX and IMCDX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for IIBAX and IMCDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer