IHY vs. ANGL
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL).
IHY and ANGL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IHY is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Ex-‐US Issuers High Yield Constrained Index. It was launched on Apr 2, 2012. ANGL is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. It was launched on Apr 10, 2012. Both IHY and ANGL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IHY or ANGL.
Key characteristics
| IHY | ANGL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.56% | 6.76% |
| 1Y Return | 13.21% | 14.05% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.31% | 0.75% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.88% | 5.14% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.88% | 6.10% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.14 | 2.61 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.10 | 4.04 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.40 | 1.51 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.84 | 1.29 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.61 | 18.06 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.98% | 0.74% |
| Daily Std Dev | 6.20% | 5.10% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.63% | -35.07% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.66% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHY and ANGL is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IHY vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IHY achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly lower than ANGL's 6.76% return. Over the past 10 years, IHY has underperformed ANGL with an annualized return of 2.88%, while ANGL has yielded a comparatively higher 6.10% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IHY vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHY has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ANGL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IHY vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IHY vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison
IHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, less than ANGL's 6.05% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHY VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF | 5.37% | 5.27% | 4.98% | 4.55% | 4.65% | 4.87% | 4.70% | 4.37% | 5.10% | 5.79% | 5.74% | 6.48% |
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.05% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.20% | 6.00% | 5.25% | 5.79% | 5.82% | 6.80% | 6.10% |
Drawdowns
IHY vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHY drawdown since its inception was -27.63%, smaller than the maximum ANGL drawdown of -35.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHY and ANGL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IHY vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) have volatilities of 1.26% and 1.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.