IHIAX vs. AMAPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IHIAX (Federated Hermes Emerging Market Debt Fund) and AMAPX (Amana Participation Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, IHIAX returned 4.04%/yr vs 2.22%/yr for AMAPX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IHIAX charges 1.18%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for AMAPX.

Performance

IHIAX vs. AMAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Emerging Market Debt Fund (IHIAX) and Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHIAX achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly higher than AMAPX's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, IHIAX has outperformed AMAPX with an annualized return of 4.04%, while AMAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.22% annualized return.

IHIAX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 2.83%
• 6M: 3.75%
• 1Y: 15.22%
• 3Y*: 12.67%
• 5Y*: 3.41%
• 10Y*: 4.04%

AMAPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 0.26%
• 6M: 0.60%
• 1Y: 4.14%
• 3Y*: 3.76%
• 5Y*: 1.34%
• 10Y*: 2.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHIAX vs. AMAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IHIAX Federated Hermes Emerging Market Debt Fund	2.83%	17.06%	6.06%	14.41%	-16.21%	-3.26%	5.79%	12.89%	-5.18%	10.36%
AMAPX Amana Participation Fund	0.26%	5.98%	3.77%	2.09%	-5.27%	0.49%	5.35%	6.61%	0.08%	2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between IHIAX and AMAPX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015	0.41

The correlation between IHIAX and AMAPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IHIAX vs. AMAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHIAX

IHIAX Risk / Return Rank: 86
IHIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
IHIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
IHIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
IHIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
IHIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

AMAPX

AMAPX Risk / Return Rank: 45
AMAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
AMAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
AMAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
AMAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
AMAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHIAX vs. AMAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Emerging Market Debt Fund (IHIAX) and Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IHIAX	AMAPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.35	1.90	+1.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.21	3.13	+2.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.59	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	1.66	+1.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.99	5.37	+8.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IHIAX vs. AMAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHIAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the AMAPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHIAX and AMAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IHIAX	AMAPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.35	1.90	+1.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.62	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	1.11	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	1.11	-0.16

Drawdowns

IHIAX vs. AMAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHIAX drawdown since its inception was -36.42%, which is greater than AMAPX's maximum drawdown of -7.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHIAX and AMAPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IHIAX	AMAPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.42%	-7.75%	-28.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.76%	-2.51%	-3.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.29%	-2.64%	-3.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.24%	-7.75%	-19.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.24%	-7.75%	-19.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-0.60%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.67%	-1.56%	-3.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.47%	0.77%	+0.70%

Volatility

IHIAX vs. AMAPX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Emerging Market Debt Fund (IHIAX) has a higher volatility of 1.67% compared to Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) at 1.50%. This indicates that IHIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IHIAX	AMAPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.67%	1.50%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.66%	1.98%	+2.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.77%	2.19%	+3.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.42%	2.19%	+4.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.50%	2.01%	+4.49%

IHIAX vs. AMAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IHIAX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than AMAPX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

IHIAX vs. AMAPX - Dividend Comparison

IHIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than AMAPX's 3.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMAPX Amana Participation Fund	3.66%	3.52%	3.15%	2.25%	1.30%	1.55%	1.95%	2.45%	2.62%	2.14%	2.14%	0.00%
IHIAX Federated Hermes Emerging Market Debt Fund	1.67%	0.28%	2.60%	2.92%	5.36%	1.91%	3.48%	1.85%	3.99%	3.78%	3.13%	3.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IHIAX and AMAPX in my portfolio?

IHIAX and AMAPX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IHIAX or AMAPX?

IHIAX has higher volatility (1.67%) compared to AMAPX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHIAX dropped -36.42% vs AMAPX's -7.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IHIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.