IHI vs. PBPH
IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - IHI tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index while PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IHI charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
IHI vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHI achieves a -20.78% return, which is significantly lower than PBPH's 2.63% return.
IHI
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -2.72%
- YTD
- -20.78%
- 6M
- -21.40%
- 1Y
- -18.62%
- 3Y*
- -3.57%
- 5Y*
- -3.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
PBPH
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IHI vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | -20.78% | -1.80% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 2.63% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHI and PBPH is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHI vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
IHI
PBPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IHI vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IHI | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.63 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IHI vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHI drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHI and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHI | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.65% | -11.10% | -38.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.20% | -5.21% | -19.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.36% | -4.36% | -4.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.44% | — | — |
Volatility
IHI vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHI | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.62% | 17.07% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 17.07% | +2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.82% | 17.07% | +2.75% |
IHI vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHI vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
IHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, more than PBPH's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | 0.49% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.55% | 1.28% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHI and PBPH have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IHI.
IHI has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.
IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IHI and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for IHI and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer