IHI vs. IWM
IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IHI is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IHI returned 8.61%/yr vs 10.76%/yr for IWM. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IHI charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
IHI vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHI achieves a -17.20% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 19.72% return. Over the past 10 years, IHI has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 8.61%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.76% annualized return.
IHI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- 6M
- -18.57%
- YTD
- -17.20%
- 1Y
- -15.43%
- 3Y*
- -2.86%
- 5Y*
- -2.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
IWM
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- YTD
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 33.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
IHI vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | -17.20% | 6.88% | 8.62% | 3.24% | -19.80% | 21.03% | 24.17% | 32.75% | 15.45% | 30.81% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 19.72% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHI and IWM is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IHI and IWM has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IHI vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IHI
IWM
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
IHI
IWM
Technology
IHI
IWM
Industrials
IHI
IWM
Basic Materials
IHI
-
IWM
Communication Services
IHI
-
IWM
Consumer Cyclical
IHI
-
IWM
Consumer Defensive
IHI
-
IWM
Energy
IHI
-
IWM
Financial Services
IHI
-
IWM
Real Estate
IHI
-
IWM
Utilities
IHI
-
IWM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHI vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
IHI
IWM
IHI vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IHI | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.29 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 3.07 | -3.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 10.87 | -12.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IHI vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHI drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHI and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHI | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.65% | -59.05% | +9.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.11% | -11.03% | -15.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | -27.50% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.12% | -31.91% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.25% | -41.13% | +7.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.82% | -2.32% | -19.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.39% | -10.73% | +2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.34% | 3.11% | +9.23% |
Volatility
IHI vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 4.81%. This indicates that IHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHI | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 4.81% | +2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.56% | 14.19% | +0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.25% | 19.54% | -1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 22.56% | -3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 23.00% | -3.14% |
IHI vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHI vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
IHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than IWM's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | 0.47% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.55% | 1.28% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.91% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHI and IWM have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHI has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to IWM (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHI dropped -49.65% vs IWM's -59.05%.
On 10-year performance, IWM leads with 10.76% vs 8.61% for IHI. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWM has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWM has performed better with a 10.76% return vs 8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IHI.
IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.47% for IHI.
IHI is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IHI and 0.19% for IWM.
IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IHI and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer