IHI vs. DXJ
IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) and DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - IHI is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, while DXJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IHI returned 8.42%/yr vs 18.40%/yr for DXJ. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IHI charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for DXJ.
Performance
IHI vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHI achieves a -18.43% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 20.15% return. Over the past 10 years, IHI has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 8.42%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.40% annualized return.
IHI
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- 6M
- -18.01%
- YTD
- -18.43%
- 1Y
- -15.42%
- 3Y*
- -3.77%
- 5Y*
- -3.32%
- 10Y*
- 8.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.83%
DXJ
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -2.97%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- YTD
- 20.15%
- 1Y
- 51.72%
- 3Y*
- 30.73%
- 5Y*
- 26.86%
- 10Y*
- 18.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.40%
IHI vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | -18.43% | 6.88% | 8.62% | 3.24% | -19.80% | 21.03% | 24.17% | 32.75% | 15.45% | 30.81% |
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 20.15% | 32.78% | 29.83% | 42.04% | 5.96% | 17.99% | 3.94% | 18.94% | -19.78% | 22.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHI and DXJ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2006 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IHI and DXJ has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IHI vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IHI
DXJ
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
IHI
DXJ
Technology
IHI
DXJ
Industrials
IHI
DXJ
Basic Materials
IHI
-
DXJ
Communication Services
IHI
-
DXJ
Consumer Cyclical
IHI
-
DXJ
Consumer Defensive
IHI
-
DXJ
Energy
IHI
-
DXJ
Financial Services
IHI
-
DXJ
Real Estate
IHI
-
DXJ
-
Utilities
IHI
-
DXJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHI vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank
IHI
DXJ
IHI vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IHI | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.51 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 4.73 | -5.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 17.82 | -19.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IHI vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHI drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, roughly equal to the maximum DXJ drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHI and DXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHI | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.65% | -49.63% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.11% | -10.98% | -15.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | -22.19% | -4.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.12% | -22.19% | -10.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.25% | -39.14% | +5.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.98% | -4.28% | -18.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -14.26% | +5.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.70% | 2.91% | +9.79% |
Volatility
IHI vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) has a higher volatility of 9.63% compared to WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) at 6.53%. This indicates that IHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHI | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.63% | 6.53% | +3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.15% | 14.44% | +1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 18.43% | +1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 19.04% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 19.93% | +0.05% |
IHI vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHI vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison
IHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than DXJ's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.98% | 1.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.02% | 2.64% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 5.95% |
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | 0.48% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.55% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHI and DXJ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHI has higher volatility (9.63%) compared to DXJ (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHI dropped -49.65% vs DXJ's -49.63%.
On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.40% vs 8.42% for IHI. On fees, IHI is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 6.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.40% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHI is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.
DXJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.48% for IHI.
IHI is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while DXJ is Japan Equities. IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IHI and 0.48% for DXJ.
DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IHI and DXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer