IHI vs. ACWI
IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IHI is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IHI returned 8.61%/yr vs 12.51%/yr for ACWI. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IHI charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
IHI vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHI achieves a -17.20% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 10.93% return. Over the past 10 years, IHI has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 8.61%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.51% annualized return.
IHI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- 6M
- -18.57%
- YTD
- -17.20%
- 1Y
- -15.43%
- 3Y*
- -2.86%
- 5Y*
- -2.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
ACWI
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.51%
IHI vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | -17.20% | 6.88% | 8.62% | 3.24% | -19.80% | 21.03% | 24.17% | 32.75% | 15.45% | 30.81% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 10.93% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 16.34% | 26.59% | -9.19% | 24.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHI and ACWI is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2008 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IHI and ACWI has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IHI vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IHI
ACWI
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
IHI
ACWI
Technology
IHI
ACWI
Industrials
IHI
ACWI
Basic Materials
IHI
-
ACWI
Communication Services
IHI
-
ACWI
Consumer Cyclical
IHI
-
ACWI
Consumer Defensive
IHI
-
ACWI
Energy
IHI
-
ACWI
Financial Services
IHI
-
ACWI
Real Estate
IHI
-
ACWI
Utilities
IHI
-
ACWI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHI vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
IHI
ACWI
IHI vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IHI | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.30 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 2.33 | -2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 9.95 | -11.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IHI vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHI drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHI and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHI | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.65% | -56.00% | +6.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.11% | -9.73% | -16.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | -16.55% | -10.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.12% | -26.42% | -6.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.25% | -33.53% | +0.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.82% | -1.89% | -19.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.39% | -8.57% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.34% | 2.27% | +10.07% |
Volatility
IHI vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 4.69%. This indicates that IHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHI | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 4.69% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.56% | 11.52% | +3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.25% | 13.72% | +4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 16.21% | +3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 17.04% | +2.82% |
IHI vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHI vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
IHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than ACWI's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.44% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | 0.47% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.55% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHI and ACWI have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHI has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to ACWI (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHI dropped -49.65% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.51% vs 8.61% for IHI. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.51% return vs 8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IHI.
ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.47% for IHI.
IHI is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IHI and 0.32% for ACWI.
ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IHI and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer