PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHDG vs. KEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IHDG vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHDG achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 42.26% return.


IHDG

1D
-0.60%
1M
4.90%
YTD
5.33%
6M
7.48%
1Y
15.52%
3Y*
10.55%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
10.09%

KEMX

1D
-1.31%
1M
13.02%
YTD
42.26%
6M
47.92%
1Y
79.97%
3Y*
29.66%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHDG vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IHDG
WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund
5.33%14.17%5.97%20.00%-11.53%19.75%10.51%12.81%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
42.26%38.28%0.36%20.57%-19.35%10.55%12.84%7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between IHDG and KEMX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019

0.66

The correlation between IHDG and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

IHDG vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IHDG
KEMX

Industrials

19.7%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

19.3%
5.4%

Financial Services

15.2%
20.7%

Healthcare

9.4%
1.7%

Technology

7.8%
41.2%

Basic Materials

5.4%
8.2%

Communication Services

4.5%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
3.0%

Energy

3.7%
4.8%

Utilities

0.8%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.2%

Industrials

IHDG
19.7%
KEMX
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IHDG
19.3%
KEMX
5.4%

Financial Services

IHDG
15.2%
KEMX
20.7%

Healthcare

IHDG
9.4%
KEMX
1.7%

Technology

IHDG
7.8%
KEMX
41.2%

Basic Materials

IHDG
5.4%
KEMX
8.2%

Communication Services

IHDG
4.5%
KEMX
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

IHDG
4.3%
KEMX
3.0%

Energy

IHDG
3.7%
KEMX
4.8%

Utilities

IHDG
0.8%
KEMX
2.0%

Real Estate

IHDG
0.3%
KEMX
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IHDG vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHDG
IHDG Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHDG vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IHDGKEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.62

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

5.24

-3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.49

20.86

-15.37

IHDG vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHDG and KEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IHDGKEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

3.59

-2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.75

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.68

-0.09

Drawdowns

IHDG vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHDG drawdown since its inception was -29.24%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHDG and KEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHDGKEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.24%

-38.80%

+9.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.49%

-15.36%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-19.62%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.52%

-30.85%

+11.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-1.31%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-8.86%

+4.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

3.85%

-1.01%

Volatility

IHDG vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG) is 4.57%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that IHDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHDGKEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

9.86%

-5.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.16%

19.90%

-8.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.55%

22.40%

-8.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.82%

18.21%

-3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.76%

20.94%

-5.18%

IHDG vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IHDG has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IHDG vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

IHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than KEMX's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IHDG
WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund
1.82%1.84%2.42%1.70%13.79%2.77%1.94%1.99%0.22%1.28%1.91%3.04%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
2.31%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IHDG and KEMX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KEMX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to IHDG (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHDG dropped -29.24% vs KEMX's -38.80%.

On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.52% vs 7.68% for IHDG. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IHDG has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 7.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for IHDG.

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.82% for IHDG.

IHDG tracks WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for IHDG and 0.25% for KEMX.

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHDG and KEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer