IHCU.L vs. ISAC.L
IHCU.L (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IHCU.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while ISAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IHCU.L returned 9.36%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for ISAC.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IHCU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISAC.L.
Performance
IHCU.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IHCU.L is traded in GBp, while ISAC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISAC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHCU.L achieves a 3.10% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 10.73% return. Over the past 10 years, IHCU.L has underperformed ISAC.L with an annualized return of 9.36%, while ISAC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.
IHCU.L
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 3.10%
- 1Y
- 20.87%
- 3Y*
- 7.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
ISAC.L
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 22.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
IHCU.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHCU.L iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 3.10% | 6.77% | 3.96% | -3.89% | 8.99% | 29.15% | 8.09% | 16.89% | 10.43% | 11.31% |
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.73% | 13.64% | 19.87% | 16.44% | -8.43% | 19.97% | 12.26% | 20.97% | -4.37% | 13.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHCU.L and ISAC.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IHCU.L and ISAC.L has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHCU.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
IHCU.L
ISAC.L
IHCU.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHCU.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IHCU.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.33 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 3.25 | -1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.47 | 11.85 | -7.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IHCU.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHCU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, which is greater than ISAC.L's maximum drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHCU.L and ISAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHCU.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.44% | -25.84% | -12.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -6.88% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.98% | -18.33% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.98% | -18.33% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.98% | -25.84% | +1.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -2.45% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -3.51% | -6.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 1.89% | +2.74% |
Volatility
IHCU.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHCU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) at 3.31%. This indicates that IHCU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHCU.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 3.31% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | 10.05% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 12.43% | +2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 14.39% | +5.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 15.40% | +3.15% |
IHCU.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHCU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IHCU.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IHCU.L nor ISAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IHCU.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IHCU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IHCU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ISAC.L.
IHCU.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while ISAC.L is Global Equities. IHCU.L tracks iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while ISAC.L tracks MSCI All Country World Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IHCU.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.
Find the right allocation for IHCU.L and ISAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer