IGTR vs. PID
IGTR (Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF) and PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Global Equities funds. IGTR is actively managed, while PID is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGTR returned 17.59%/yr vs 12.52%/yr for PID. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGTR charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PID.
Performance
IGTR vs. PID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGTR achieves a 21.49% return, which is significantly higher than PID's 5.45% return.
IGTR
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 13.18%
- YTD
- 21.49%
- 6M
- 24.80%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- 17.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PID
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 5.45%
- 6M
- 6.61%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
IGTR vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGTR Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF | 21.49% | 15.25% | 4.02% | -0.31% | -2.08% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 5.45% | 24.45% | 3.08% | 14.28% | -0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGTR and PID is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2022 | 0.62 |
The correlation between IGTR and PID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGTR vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGTR
PID
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
IGTR
PID
Industrials
IGTR
PID
Technology
IGTR
PID
Healthcare
IGTR
PID
Consumer Cyclical
IGTR
PID
Basic Materials
IGTR
PID
Energy
IGTR
PID
Real Estate
IGTR
PID
Consumer Defensive
IGTR
PID
Communication Services
IGTR
PID
Utilities
IGTR
PID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGTR vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank
IGTR
PID
IGTR vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF (IGTR) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGTR | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.30 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 2.16 | +1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 7.36 | +6.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGTR | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 1.66 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.27 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
IGTR vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGTR drawdown since its inception was -20.06%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGTR and PID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGTR | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.06% | -66.34% | +46.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.18% | -7.47% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.06% | -13.34% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -2.19% | +1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -13.04% | +6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 2.18% | +0.93% |
Volatility
IGTR vs. PID - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF (IGTR) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 2.75%. This indicates that IGTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGTR | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.29% | 2.75% | +4.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.97% | 7.62% | +6.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.32% | 9.70% | +9.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 13.97% | +2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 17.84% | -1.02% |
IGTR vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGTR has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGTR vs. PID - Dividend Comparison
IGTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than PID's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGTR Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF | 0.66% | 0.80% | 2.40% | 0.87% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.88% | 3.31% | 3.30% | 3.30% | 3.16% | 3.99% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 4.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGTR and PID have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGTR has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to PID (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGTR dropped -20.06% vs PID's -66.34%.
On 3-year performance, IGTR leads with 17.59% vs 12.52% for PID. On fees, PID is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IGTR has performed better with a 17.59% return vs 12.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PID is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IGTR.
PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.66% for IGTR.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IGTR and 0.56% for PID.
IGTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGTR and PID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer