IGTR vs. NZAC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IGTR (Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF) and NZAC (SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF) are both Global Equities funds. IGTR is actively managed, while NZAC is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGTR returned 17.59%/yr vs 19.06%/yr for NZAC. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGTR charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for NZAC.

Performance

IGTR vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF (IGTR) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGTR achieves a 21.49% return, which is significantly higher than NZAC's 8.83% return.

IGTR

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 13.18%
• YTD: 21.49%
• 6M: 24.80%
• 1Y: 43.30%
• 3Y*: 17.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NZAC

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 4.49%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 9.51%
• 1Y: 24.74%
• 3Y*: 19.06%
• 5Y*: 9.88%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGTR vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IGTR Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF	21.49%	15.25%	4.02%	-0.31%	-2.08%
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	8.83%	20.55%	16.67%	23.22%	-0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between IGTR and NZAC is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2022	0.79

The correlation between IGTR and NZAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGTR vs. NZAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IGTR	NZAC
Financial Services	25.7%	13.1%
Industrials	20.7%	7.3%
Technology	13.2%	34.3%
Healthcare	8.2%	7.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	8.2%
Basic Materials	8.1%	1.9%
Energy	4.8%	1.2%
Real Estate	3.5%	5.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	1.0%
Communication Services	2.4%	8.5%
Utilities	2.0%	1.4%

Return for Risk

IGTR vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGTR

IGTR Risk / Return Rank: 71
IGTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
IGTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IGTR Omega Ratio Rank: 66
IGTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
IGTR Martin Ratio Rank: 74

NZAC

NZAC Risk / Return Rank: 56
NZAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
NZAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
NZAC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
NZAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
NZAC Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGTR vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF (IGTR) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IGTR	NZAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	1.92	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	2.71	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.34	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.89	2.46	+1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.97	10.68	+3.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGTR vs. NZAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the NZAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGTR and NZAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IGTR	NZAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.25	1.92	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.61	+0.01

Drawdowns

IGTR vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGTR drawdown since its inception was -20.06%, smaller than the maximum NZAC drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGTR and NZAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGTR	NZAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.06%	-33.72%	+13.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.18%	-10.10%	-1.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.06%	-16.19%	-3.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-0.82%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.97%	-5.32%	-1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	2.32%	+0.79%

Volatility

IGTR vs. NZAC - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF (IGTR) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) at 3.72%. This indicates that IGTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NZAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGTR	NZAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.29%	3.72%	+3.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.97%	10.34%	+3.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.32%	12.94%	+6.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.82%	16.81%	+0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.82%	17.14%	-0.32%

IGTR vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGTR has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGTR vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison

IGTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than NZAC's 2.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGTR Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF	0.66%	0.80%	2.40%	0.87%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	2.04%	1.90%	1.88%	1.65%	1.81%	1.62%	1.59%	2.17%	2.53%	2.20%	2.00%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGTR and NZAC in my portfolio?

IGTR and NZAC have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGTR or NZAC?

IGTR has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to NZAC (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGTR dropped -20.06% vs NZAC's -33.72%.

Which ETF is better, IGTR or NZAC?

On 3-year performance, NZAC leads with 19.06% vs 17.59% for IGTR. On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, NZAC has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IGTR or NZAC?

Over the 3-year period, NZAC has performed better with a 19.06% return vs 17.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGTR or NZAC?

NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IGTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGTR or NZAC?

NZAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.66% for IGTR.

What is the main difference between IGTR and NZAC?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IGTR and 0.12% for NZAC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.