IGSG.L vs. IITU.L
IGSG.L (iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IGSG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGSG.L returned 13.10%/yr vs 27.26%/yr for IITU.L. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGSG.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
IGSG.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGSG.L achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, IGSG.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 13.10%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.26% annualized return.
IGSG.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 5.67%
- YTD
- 9.09%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 24.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
IGSG.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGSG.L iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.09% | 14.21% | 12.74% | 19.46% | -7.27% | 23.00% | 9.72% | 21.71% | -3.46% | 11.82% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGSG.L and IITU.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.80 |
The correlation between IGSG.L and IITU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IGSG.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGSG.L
IITU.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
IGSG.L
IITU.L
Financial Services
IGSG.L
IITU.L
-
Industrials
IGSG.L
IITU.L
Healthcare
IGSG.L
IITU.L
-
Basic Materials
IGSG.L
IITU.L
-
Energy
IGSG.L
IITU.L
Consumer Cyclical
IGSG.L
IITU.L
-
Communication Services
IGSG.L
IITU.L
-
Utilities
IGSG.L
IITU.L
-
Real Estate
IGSG.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IGSG.L
IITU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGSG.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGSG.L
IITU.L
IGSG.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGSG.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.44 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 3.17 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.52 | 8.17 | +3.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGSG.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.71 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 1.16 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | 1.28 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.23 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
IGSG.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGSG.L drawdown since its inception was -24.74%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGSG.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGSG.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.74% | -28.03% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.21% | -16.76% | +8.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.54% | -28.03% | +11.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.54% | -28.03% | +11.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.74% | -28.03% | +3.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.89% | +2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -5.14% | +1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 6.51% | -4.39% |
Volatility
IGSG.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSG.L) is 2.92%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that IGSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGSG.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 7.01% | -4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.40% | 14.45% | -6.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.53% | 19.60% | -9.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 21.94% | -9.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.14% | 21.31% | -7.17% |
IGSG.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGSG.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGSG.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGSG.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IGSG.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IGSG.L.
IGSG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. IGSG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IGSG.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for IGSG.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer