PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGSG.L vs. IAEX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGSG.L vs. IAEX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSG.L) and iShares AEX UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IAEX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGSG.L achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly lower than IAEX.L's 13.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IGSG.L having a 13.33% annualized return and IAEX.L not far ahead at 13.40%.


IGSG.L

1D
1.08%
1M
2.53%
YTD
8.54%
6M
9.10%
1Y
23.09%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
13.33%

IAEX.L

1D
-0.37%
1M
5.77%
YTD
13.70%
6M
13.17%
1Y
21.05%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
13.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGSG.L vs. IAEX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGSG.L
iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
8.54%14.21%12.74%19.46%-7.27%23.00%9.72%21.71%-3.46%11.82%
IAEX.L
iShares AEX UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
13.70%16.14%8.60%14.11%-6.28%21.00%10.97%21.66%-7.74%20.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IGSG.L and IAEX.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.82

The correlation between IGSG.L and IAEX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IGSG.L vs. IAEX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IGSG.L
IAEX.L

Technology

37.2%
28.0%

Financial Services

19.0%
14.9%

Industrials

12.7%
8.2%

Healthcare

8.8%
1.8%

Basic Materials

5.3%
5.8%

Energy

3.6%
14.1%

Communication Services

3.4%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
5.2%

Utilities

3.0%

-

Real Estate

2.0%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
17.5%

Technology

IGSG.L
37.2%
IAEX.L
28.0%

Financial Services

IGSG.L
19.0%
IAEX.L
14.9%

Industrials

IGSG.L
12.7%
IAEX.L
8.2%

Healthcare

IGSG.L
8.8%
IAEX.L
1.8%

Basic Materials

IGSG.L
5.3%
IAEX.L
5.8%

Energy

IGSG.L
3.6%
IAEX.L
14.1%

Communication Services

IGSG.L
3.4%
IAEX.L
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IGSG.L
3.4%
IAEX.L
5.2%

Utilities

IGSG.L
3.0%
IAEX.L

-

Real Estate

IGSG.L
2.0%
IAEX.L
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

IGSG.L
1.8%
IAEX.L
17.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGSG.L vs. IAEX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGSG.L
IGSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IGSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IGSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

IAEX.L
IAEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IAEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IAEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGSG.L vs. IAEX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSG.L) and iShares AEX UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IAEX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGSG.LIAEX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.30

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

2.78

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.74

8.06

+2.68

IGSG.L vs. IAEX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGSG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the IAEX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGSG.L and IAEX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGSG.L vs. IAEX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGSG.L drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, smaller than the maximum IAEX.L drawdown of -63.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGSG.L and IAEX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGSG.LIAEX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.54%

-63.74%

+14.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.21%

-7.54%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.05%

-12.80%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.05%

-21.96%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.74%

-28.85%

+4.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.37%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.20%

-16.63%

+3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.60%

-0.46%

Volatility

IGSG.L vs. IAEX.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to iShares AEX UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IAEX.L) at 3.00%. This indicates that IGSG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAEX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGSG.LIAEX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

3.00%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.68%

10.37%

-1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.77%

12.77%

-2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.88%

15.20%

+3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

16.16%

+1.06%

IGSG.L vs. IAEX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGSG.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IAEX.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGSG.L vs. IAEX.L - Dividend Comparison

IGSG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IAEX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAEX.L
iShares AEX UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.96%2.03%2.16%2.09%2.20%1.57%1.41%2.89%3.11%2.70%2.73%2.85%
IGSG.L
iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGSG.L and IAEX.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IAEX.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IAEX.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IGSG.L.

IGSG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IAEX.L is Europe Equities. IGSG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IAEX.L tracks Euronext AEX All Share TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IGSG.L and 0.30% for IAEX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGSG.L and IAEX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer