IGR vs. IRFIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IGR (CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund) and IRFIX (Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 10 years, IGR returned 5.67%/yr vs 2.61%/yr for IRFIX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGR charges 0.04%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for IRFIX.

Performance

IGR vs. IRFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund (IGR) and Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGR achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than IRFIX's -0.55% return. Over the past 10 years, IGR has outperformed IRFIX with an annualized return of 5.67%, while IRFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.61% annualized return.

IGR

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: -2.15%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 7.06%
• 1Y: 2.51%
• 3Y*: 10.13%
• 5Y*: 0.19%
• 10Y*: 5.67%

IRFIX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -3.71%
• YTD: -0.55%
• 6M: 0.95%
• 1Y: 7.06%
• 3Y*: 5.34%
• 5Y*: -3.15%
• 10Y*: 2.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGR vs. IRFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IGR CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund	9.93%	5.24%	1.19%	15.91%	-35.51%	52.83%	-5.27%	41.04%	-15.51%	17.32%
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund	-0.55%	23.52%	-10.56%	4.58%	-23.84%	7.66%	-0.81%	23.74%	-3.74%	23.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IGR and IRFIX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2005	0.52

The correlation between IGR and IRFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IGR vs. IRFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGR

IGR Risk / Return Rank: 3
IGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
IGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
IGR Omega Ratio Rank: 3
IGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
IGR Martin Ratio Rank: 3

IRFIX

IRFIX Risk / Return Rank: 6
IRFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
IRFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
IRFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
IRFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
IRFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGR vs. IRFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund (IGR) and Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IGR	IRFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.14	0.50	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	0.83	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.10	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	0.44	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.39	1.38	-0.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGR vs. IRFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the IRFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGR and IRFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IGR	IRFIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14	0.50	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	-0.21	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	0.17	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.19	-0.02

Drawdowns

IGR vs. IRFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGR drawdown since its inception was -87.17%, which is greater than IRFIX's maximum drawdown of -70.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGR and IRFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGR	IRFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.17%	-70.13%	-17.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.14%	-14.85%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.54%	-21.06%	-8.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.61%	-38.41%	-9.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.29%	-39.51%	-14.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.50%	-17.16%	+4.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.50%	-18.66%	-5.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.48%	4.71%	+1.77%

Volatility

IGR vs. IRFIX - Volatility Comparison

CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund (IGR) has a higher volatility of 6.37% compared to Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) at 3.87%. This indicates that IGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGR	IRFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.37%	3.87%	+2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.65%	10.74%	+3.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.61%	12.95%	+5.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.77%	15.32%	+9.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.47%	15.68%	+8.79%

IGR vs. IRFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGR has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IRFIX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGR vs. IRFIX - Dividend Comparison

IGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.93%, more than IRFIX's 6.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGR CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund	15.93%	16.44%	14.97%	15.38%	12.22%	6.13%	8.72%	7.48%	9.74%	7.58%	8.84%	7.46%
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund	6.20%	6.17%	3.24%	2.62%	2.62%	7.70%	3.40%	9.81%	4.19%	3.37%	6.46%	3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGR and IRFIX in my portfolio?

IGR and IRFIX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGR or IRFIX?

IGR has higher volatility (6.37%) compared to IRFIX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGR dropped -87.17% vs IRFIX's -70.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IRFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.