PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGPT vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGPT vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGPT achieves a 68.99% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 9.63% return. Over the past 10 years, IGPT has outperformed YCS with an annualized return of 22.51%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.62% annualized return.


IGPT

1D
-7.04%
1M
9.45%
YTD
68.99%
6M
69.36%
1Y
115.70%
3Y*
42.39%
5Y*
14.53%
10Y*
22.51%

YCS

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.57%
YTD
9.63%
6M
10.44%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
23.52%
10Y*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGPT vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
68.99%31.55%17.15%27.29%-27.73%-11.79%54.31%35.06%16.38%34.60%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
9.63%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IGPT and YCS is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2008

0.14

The correlation between IGPT and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGPT vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGPT
IGPT Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
IGPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGPT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IGPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGPT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGPT vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGPTYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.34

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.98

3.78

+3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.88

11.93

+13.95

IGPT vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGPT Sharpe Ratio is 3.51, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGPT and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGPT vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGPT drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, roughly equal to the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGPT and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGPTYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.14%

-49.56%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.68%

-8.30%

-8.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.30%

-23.05%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.87%

-27.32%

-17.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.14%

-27.32%

-22.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.04%

-0.14%

-6.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.94%

-19.87%

+7.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

2.65%

+1.84%

Volatility

IGPT vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) has a higher volatility of 19.26% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that IGPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGPTYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.26%

2.25%

+17.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.98%

12.19%

+16.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.13%

16.93%

+16.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.71%

21.10%

+7.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.86%

18.82%

+8.04%

IGPT vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGPT has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGPT vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

IGPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
0.01%0.04%0.00%0.00%1.41%6.21%0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.15%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGPT and YCS have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGPT has higher volatility (19.26%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGPT dropped -50.14% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 10-year performance, IGPT leads with 22.51% vs 13.62% for YCS. On fees, IGPT is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGPT has performed better with a 22.51% return vs 13.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGPT is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

IGPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

IGPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. IGPT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IGPT and 1.00% for YCS.

IGPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGPT and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer