IGPT vs. XLK
IGPT (Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IGPT tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGPT returned 22.51%/yr vs 25.48%/yr for XLK. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGPT charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
IGPT vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGPT achieves a 68.99% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 28.25% return. Over the past 10 years, IGPT has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 22.51%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.48% annualized return.
IGPT
- 1D
- -7.04%
- 1M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 68.99%
- 6M
- 69.36%
- 1Y
- 115.70%
- 3Y*
- 42.39%
- 5Y*
- 14.53%
- 10Y*
- 22.51%
XLK
- 1D
- -4.14%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 28.25%
- 6M
- 26.51%
- 1Y
- 52.47%
- 3Y*
- 30.61%
- 5Y*
- 21.34%
- 10Y*
- 25.48%
IGPT vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF | 68.99% | 31.55% | 17.15% | 27.29% | -27.73% | -11.79% | 54.31% | 35.06% | 16.38% | 34.60% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.25% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGPT and XLK is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.81 |
The correlation between IGPT and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGPT vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGPT
XLK
Technology
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGPT
XLK
Communication Services
IGPT
XLK
-
Real Estate
IGPT
XLK
-
Industrials
IGPT
XLK
Healthcare
IGPT
XLK
-
Financial Services
IGPT
XLK
-
Basic Materials
IGPT
-
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGPT
-
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
IGPT
-
XLK
-
Energy
IGPT
-
XLK
Utilities
IGPT
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGPT vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
IGPT
XLK
IGPT vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGPT | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.38 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.98 | 3.31 | +3.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.88 | 10.56 | +15.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGPT vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGPT drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGPT and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGPT | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.14% | -82.05% | +31.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.68% | -15.92% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.30% | -25.66% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.87% | -33.56% | -11.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.14% | -33.56% | -16.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.04% | -6.96% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.94% | -34.90% | +22.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 4.98% | -0.49% |
Volatility
IGPT vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) has a higher volatility of 19.26% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 12.51%. This indicates that IGPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGPT | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.26% | 12.51% | +6.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.98% | 19.70% | +9.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.13% | 23.48% | +9.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.71% | 25.37% | +3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.86% | 24.71% | +2.15% |
IGPT vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGPT has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGPT vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
IGPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than XLK's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF | 0.01% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% | 6.21% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.15% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.43% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGPT and XLK have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGPT has higher volatility (19.26%) compared to XLK (12.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGPT dropped -50.14% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.48% vs 22.51% for IGPT. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 12.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.48% return vs 22.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IGPT.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.01% for IGPT.
IGPT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IGPT and 0.08% for XLK.
IGPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGPT and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer