PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IGPT vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IGPT vs. USO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IGPT (Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - IGPT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGPT returned 22.30%/yr vs 4.07%/yr for USO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGPT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.

Performance

IGPT vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGPT achieves a 72.49% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return. Over the past 10 years, IGPT has outperformed USO with an annualized return of 22.30%, while USO has yielded a comparatively lower 4.07% annualized return.

IGPT

1D
0.39%
1M
28.39%
YTD
72.49%
6M
75.56%
1Y
123.95%
3Y*
43.05%
5Y*
15.89%
10Y*
22.30%

USO

1D
2.62%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
103.67%
6M
99.35%
1Y
101.55%
3Y*
29.98%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
4.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGPT vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF		72.49%31.55%17.15%27.29%-27.73%-11.79%54.31%35.06%16.38%34.60%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP		103.67%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%-67.79%32.61%-19.57%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between IGPT and USO is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2006

0.18

The correlation between IGPT and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF

United States Oil Fund LP

Often compared with IGPT:
IGPT vs. AIQIGPT vs. CHATIGPT vs. BOTZIGPT vs. QQQIGPT vs. IRBOIGPT vs. VGTIGPT vs. XAIX
Often compared with USO:
USO vs. XLEUSO vs. BNOUSO vs. UCOUSO vs. USLUSO vs. OILKUSO vs. DBOUSO vs. WTI

Return for Risk

IGPT vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IGPT
IGPT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
IGPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGPT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IGPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGPT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGPT vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IGPTUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.39
2.31

+2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.95
2.89

+2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.38

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.47

5.01

+2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.16

9.42

+19.74

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGPT vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGPT Sharpe Ratio is 4.39, which is higher than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGPT and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IGPTUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.39

2.31

+2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.68

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.10

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

-0.18

+0.81

Drawdowns

IGPT vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGPT drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGPT and USO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IGPTUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.14%

-98.19%

+48.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.68%

-20.39%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.30%

-26.05%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.87%

-36.23%

-8.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.14%

-86.75%

+36.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-85.01%

+85.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.96%

-75.30%

+63.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

10.82%

-6.55%

Volatility

IGPT vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) is 12.51%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that IGPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IGPTUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.51%

14.87%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.50%

38.23%

-14.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.42%

44.20%

-15.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.66%

36.06%

-8.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.33%

39.00%

-12.67%

IGPT vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGPT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGPT vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

IGPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF		0.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%1.41%6.21%0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.15%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

IGPT and USO have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to IGPT (12.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGPT dropped -50.14% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 10-year performance, IGPT leads with 22.30% vs 4.07% for USO. On fees, IGPT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, IGPT has been the lower-risk option at 12.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGPT has performed better with a 22.30% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGPT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

IGPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

IGPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. IGPT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IGPT and 0.86% for USO.

IGPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.39 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGPT and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer