IGPT vs. IBLC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IGPT (Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGPT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index, while IBLC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGPT returned 43.05%/yr vs 48.31%/yr for IBLC. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGPT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.

Performance

IGPT vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGPT achieves a 72.49% return, which is significantly higher than IBLC's 32.34% return.

IGPT

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 28.39%
• YTD: 72.49%
• 6M: 75.56%
• 1Y: 123.95%
• 3Y*: 43.05%
• 5Y*: 15.89%
• 10Y*: 22.30%

IBLC

• 1D: -3.00%
• 1M: 13.52%
• YTD: 32.34%
• 6M: 15.25%
• 1Y: 73.27%
• 3Y*: 48.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGPT vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF	72.49%	31.55%	17.15%	27.29%	-7.12%
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	32.34%	27.05%	18.58%	201.47%	-57.76%

Correlation

The correlation between IGPT and IBLC is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022	0.66

The correlation between IGPT and IBLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGPT vs. IBLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IGPT	IBLC
Technology	73.9%	30.7%
Communication Services	15.6%	2.5%
Real Estate	3.9%	-
Healthcare	3.6%	-
Industrials	3.1%	-
Financial Services	1.3%	66.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

IGPT vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGPT

IGPT Risk / Return Rank: 94
IGPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
IGPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
IGPT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
IGPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
IGPT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

IBLC

IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 33
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGPT vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IGPT	IBLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.39	1.34	+3.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.95	1.92	+3.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.67	1.23	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.47	1.64	+5.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.16	3.26	+25.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGPT vs. IBLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGPT Sharpe Ratio is 4.39, which is higher than the IBLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGPT and IBLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IGPT	IBLC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.39	1.34	+3.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.40	+0.24

Drawdowns

IGPT vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGPT drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGPT and IBLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGPT	IBLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.14%	-62.54%	+12.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.68%	-44.94%	+28.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.30%	-51.68%	+22.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-12.99%	+12.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.96%	-25.89%	+13.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.27%	22.56%	-18.29%

Volatility

IGPT vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) is 12.51%, while iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) has a volatility of 14.67%. This indicates that IGPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGPT	IBLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.51%	14.67%	-2.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.50%	40.76%	-17.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.42%	54.94%	-26.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.66%	64.49%	-36.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.33%	64.49%	-38.16%

IGPT vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGPT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGPT vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison

IGPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than IBLC's 4.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	4.77%	6.31%	1.60%	1.79%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF	0.03%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	1.41%	6.21%	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGPT and IBLC in my portfolio?

IGPT and IBLC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGPT or IBLC?

IBLC has higher volatility (14.67%) compared to IGPT (12.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGPT dropped -50.14% vs IBLC's -62.54%.

Which ETF is better, IGPT or IBLC?

On 3-year performance, IBLC leads with 48.31% vs 43.05% for IGPT. On fees, IBLC is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IGPT has been the lower-risk option at 12.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IGPT or IBLC?

Over the 3-year period, IBLC has performed better with a 48.31% return vs 43.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGPT or IBLC?

IBLC is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IGPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGPT or IBLC?

IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 0.03% for IGPT.

What is the main difference between IGPT and IBLC?

IGPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while IBLC is Cryptocurrency. IGPT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index, while IBLC tracks ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IGPT and 0.47% for IBLC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.39 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.